期刊文献+

基于知识本体的过程安全分析信息标准化 被引量:12

Standardized information for process hazard analysis based on ontology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 过程危险分析的主要目标是识别危险剧情。危险剧情能够表达团队'头脑风暴'安全评价过程也能表达评价结论。危险剧情的知识本体是标准化过程安全分析信息的准确描述。知识本体是概念表达的明确规范。依据设计知识本体所遵循的规则提出了一种过程安全分析信息标准化方法,称为剧情对象模型(scenario objectmodel,SOM)。SOM能够表达安全分析信息的内容和结构,能够实施计算机自动推理和半定量计算。应用知识本体SOM有效实现了计算机辅助自动安全评价和安全信息的传递、复查和共享。 The principal objective of process hazard analysis is to identify hazard scenarios.Both the course of team brainstorming hazard evaluation and its result information can be expressed as hazard scenarios.Ontology of hazard scenarios is accurate expression of standardized process hazard analysis information.An ontology is an explicit specification of a conceptualization.According to design criteria for ontologies,a standardized process hazard analysis information called scenario object model(SOM)was proposed.SOM was used to represent contents and structures of hazard evaluation information.Computer automatic reasoning and semi-quantitative algorithms could be implemented on SOM.Computer-aided automatic hazard evaluation and transfer,auditing and sharing of safety information were realized effectively by using ontology SOM.
出处 《化工学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期1484-1491,共8页 CIESC Journal
关键词 知识本体 信息标准 过程工业 危险剧情 SOM SOM_G HAZOP PHA ontology information standard process industry hazard scenario SOM SOM_G HAZOP PHA
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献50

  • 1黄卫东,王克昌,黄卫东.基于定性和定量关系的液体火箭发动机故障诊断[J].航空动力学报,1996,11(3):281-284. 被引量:16
  • 2International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61882, Hazard and Operability Studies ( HAZOP Studies ) Application Guide, 2001.
  • 3Wu Chongguang(吴重光).System Modeling and Simulation(系统建模与仿真).Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2008.
  • 4Williams Tom R. Layer of protection analysis: generating scenarios automatically from HAZOP data. Process Safety Progress, 2005, 24:38- 44.
  • 5Lapp S A, Powers G J, Computer-aided synthesis of faulttrees. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1977, 26 (2): 2- 12.
  • 6Iri M, Aoki K, O'shima E, Matsuyama H. An algorithm for diagnosis of system failures in the chemical process. Computer & Chemical Engineering, 1979 (3) : 489 -493.
  • 7Umeda T, Kuriyama T. A graphical approach to cause and effect analysis of chemical processing systems. Chemical Engineering Science, 1980, 35: 2379-2388.
  • 8Shiozaki J, Matsuyama H, Tano K, O'shima E. Fault diagnosis of chemical processes by the use of signed, directed graphs. Extension to fire-range patterns of abnormality. International Chemical Engineering, 1985, 25 (4): 651-659.
  • 9Tsuge Y, Shiozaki J, Matsuyama H, O'shima E, Iguchi Y, Fuchigami M, Matsushita M. Fesibility study of a fault-diagnosis system for chemical plants. International Chemical Engineering, 1985, 25 (4) : 660 -667.
  • 10Kramer M A, Palowitch B L. A rule based approach to fault diagnosis using the signed directed graph. AIChE Journal, 1987, 33 (7): 1607-1078.

共引文献74

同被引文献114

引证文献12

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部