期刊文献+

西方主流经济学基本研究方法评析——重温《哲学的贫困》的思考

Analysis on Basic Research Method of Mainstream Economics in the West
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方主流经济学哲学上的唯心主义和形而上的思维是导致其不能深刻认识现代经济特征、做出合理预测和有效解决问题的根源。因此,主流经济学的实证与规范分析存在很大的缺陷。《哲学的贫困》是马克思开始运用辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义进行经济分析的标志性文献。逻辑与历史相统一是认识经济现象、把握经济发展变化的根本方法,在今天看来,这一根本方法对审视主流经济学研究的缺陷及指导我国经济理论研究依然有重要意义。 The original reason why mainstream economics can not realize modern economy features and give reasonable prediction and resolve problems deeply and efficiently due to the idealism and metaphysics thoughts in philosophy perspective.So,there is big defect of empirical and standard analysis of mainstream economics.The Poverty of Philosophy is the remarkable literature of Marx to analysis economy by using dialectical materialism and historical materialism.The combination of logic and history is the fundamental method to get to know economic phenomena and to evaluate economic development,which has significant meaning to judge the defect of mainstream economy analysis and guide the economic theory study of China,even today.
作者 陈锴
机构地区 厦门大学
出处 《桂海论丛》 2012年第2期72-75,共4页 Guihai Tribune
关键词 《哲学的贫困》 主流经济学 基本方法 The Poverty of Philosophy mainstream economics fundamental methodology
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1马克思.资本论[M].北京:人民出版社,2004(vo1.1)..
  • 2爱因斯坦.爱因斯坦文集:第1卷[M].许良英,编译.北京:商务印书馆,1976:574.
  • 3贾根良,崔学锋.当前西方经济学界主流与异端的分裂及其发展趋势[J].当代经济研究,2005(6):34-39. 被引量:10
  • 4Milton Friedman.The Methodology of Positive Economics.Essays in positive economics.university of chicargo press(1953),1970,pp.3-43.
  • 5Samuelson,P.Theory and Realism:A Reply.theAmerican Economic Review 54:736-740.
  • 6马克思.哲学的贫困.[M].北京:人民出版社,1961.
  • 7布劳格.经济学方法论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992..

二级参考文献13

  • 1Steven Cohn. Common Ground Critiques of Neoclassical Principle Texts, Post-autistic economics review, Issue 18,2003.
  • 2彼得·索多鲍姆.诺贝尔经济学奖:新思想的绊脚石[N].经济学消息报,2004—11—26.
  • 3Alan Shipman. "Economics: The Disappearing Science? Post-autistic economics review, 2003, Issue 20.
  • 4Geoffrey M Hodgson (1999): Evolution and Institution: On Evolutionary Economics and the Evolution of Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, P2.
  • 5阿尔弗雷德·艾克纳.经济学为什么还不是一门科学?[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1990.2.
  • 6Tony Lawson (2003). Reorienting Economics, Roudedge Press, London, p5-6.
  • 7Frederic S. Lee (2001): Mutual Aid and the Making of Heterodox Economics in Postwar America : a Post Keynesian View.History of Economics Review.
  • 8Robert Scott Gassier. "A Framework for Heterodox Economics", Economics for the Future, Cambridge (UK) 17-19September 2003.
  • 9Peter Nielsen,Reflections on Critical Realism in Political economy, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2002, 26.
  • 10Frederic S. Lee (2002): The Association for Heterodox economics: Past, Present and Future. Journal of Australian Political Economy, December 2002.

共引文献135

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部