期刊文献+

叛逆的反射:弗里德曼的规划冥想与当代规划理论发展 被引量:2

An Insurgent Re?ection:John Friedmann's'Thinking about Planning'and the Development ofC ontemporary Planning Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文试图将弗里德曼的学术研究发展历程与当代规划理论的演进过程做一个对照研究,研究的基点是弗里德曼2011年出版的个人精选集《叛逆:规划理论论文集》和其他相关论文。弗里德曼的学术道路可分为四个阶段:规划理论研究产生时期、理性决策论后的乱局、全球化下的城市竞争时期以及新型民主发展时期。与之相应,弗里德曼探讨了几个主题:贫困与赋权以及市民社会;社会学习下的知识与行动以及互动式规划;美好社会、美好城市和多样化的规划文化;重新反思规划理论。 This article aims to compare the development of John Friedmann's academic research with the evolution of contemporary planning theory.Friedmann's personal collection,Insurgencies:Essays in Planning Theory,published in 2011,and other related papers are taken as a basis for analysis.The personal development of Friedmann's academic research could be divided into 4 stages:the beginning of planning theory research,chaos after rational decision-making,urban competitiveness under globalization,and a new democracy.Correspondingly,Friedmann raises four focuses:poverty and empowerment,and civil society;linkage between knowledge and action under social learning and transactive planning;good society,good city and multiple planning cultures;and rethinking planning theory.
作者 曹康 谢莹
出处 《国际城市规划》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期73-79,共7页 Urban Planning International
基金 浙江省之江社科青年学者行动计划 浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金 浙江省教育厅科研项目资助
关键词 叛逆 弗里德曼 规划理论 Insurgency Friedmann Planning Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1约翰.弗里德曼,曹新新.重温规划理论[J].国外城市规划,2005(5):37-42. 被引量:13
  • 2Batty,M.1979.On Planning Processes[A].In,Goodall,B.and Kirby,A.,eds.Resources and Planning[C].Oxford:Pergamon:17-50.
  • 3Faludi,A.1987.A Decision-Centred View of Environmental Planning[M].Oxford:Pergamon Press.
  • 4Friedmann,J.1987.Planning in the Public Domain:From Knowledge to Action[M].Oxford:Princeton University Press.
  • 5Allmendinger,P.2002.Planning Theory[M].Hampshire:Palgrave.
  • 6Hall,P.2002.Cities of Tomorrow:An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century[M],3rd edition.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers.
  • 7Hillier,J.and Healey,P.Introduction[A].2008.In,Hillier,J.and Healey,P.,eds.Foundations of the Planning Enterprise,Critical Essays in Planning Theory:Volume1[C].Aldershot:Ashgate:ix-xxvii.
  • 8Myerson,M.and Ban?eld,E.C.Politics,Planning and the Public Interest:The Case of Public Housing in Chicago[M].New York:Free Press,1955:314.
  • 9Mannheim,K.1940.Man and Society in An Age of Reconstruction[M].London:Routledge.
  • 10大卫.哈维.后现代的状况——对文化变迁之缘起的探究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003:164-165.

二级参考文献69

  • 1马向明,吕晓蓓.区域绿地:从概念到实践——一次“协作式规划”的探索[J].城市规划,2006,30(11):46-50. 被引量:19
  • 2[美]罗伯特·所罗门.大问题:简明哲学导论[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004:188,189.
  • 3P Hamilton. The Enlightenment and the Birth of Social Science [A]. In S Hall,B Gieben. Formations of Modernity [C]. Milton Keynes: Open University Press,1992.
  • 4Low N. Planning, Politics and the State: Political Foundations of Planning Thought[M]. London: Unwin Hyman, 1991.
  • 5Alexander E. After Rationality: Towards a Contingency Theory for Planning[A]. Mandelbaum S J, Mazza L, Burchell R W. Explorations in Planning Theory[C]. New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research, 1996: 45-64.
  • 6Friedmann J, Planning in the Public Domain: from Knowledge to Action [M]. Oxford: Princeton University Press, 1987.
  • 7Hayes C, Faissler M. Modern times: the French Revolution to the Present[M]. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc. , 1966.
  • 8Myerson M, Banfield E C. Politics, Planning and the Public Interest: the Case of Public Housing in Chicago [M]. New York: Free Press,1955.
  • 9Meyerson M. Building the Middle-Range Bridge for Comprehensive Planning[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1956, 22(2).
  • 10McLoughlin J B. Urban and Regional Planning: a Systems Approach [M]. London: Faber & Faber, 1969.

共引文献134

同被引文献37

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部