期刊文献+

产权信念及其对公平偏好与自利偏好的挤出 被引量:1

The Belief in Property Rights and Its Crowding-out Effects on Fairness and Self-interest Preference
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统经济理论将产权作为经济绩效的外生变量,但是人类社会的演化路径表明产权是内生于人类族群的共同信念,它与内置于人类心智的公平偏好交互作用影响个体的决策行为。文章运用比较制度实验方法针对不同来源的产权考察其认同信念及其对公平偏好的影响。实验发现,产权不仅导致提议者对回应者和接受者有产权认同信念,也导致提议者的自利偏好和回应者的公平偏好被挤出;通过对利他偏好、策略行为和第三方评价的分离,测度了产权信念;提议者没有强烈的公平偏好动机,而是通过策略行为来最大化自身利益。 Traditional economic theories regard property rights as an exogenous variable of economic performance,but the evolutionary route of human society shows that property rights are the endogenous common belief of human population.The interaction between property rights and fairness preference built in human mind affects individual decision-making behavior.This paper studies the consent belief in property rights with different sources and its crowding-out effect on fairness preference by comparative-institution experimental methods.It finds that property rights result in not only proponents' recognition of respondents and recipients' belief in property rights,but also the crowding-out effects on proponents' self-interest preference and respondents' fairness preference;it measures the belief in property rights by the separation of altruism,strategic behavior and third-party evaluation;the proponents do not have a strong motive for fairness preference,but maximize their own gains by strategic behavior.
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期94-104,共11页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972086 71172068 71132001) 国家社会科学基金资助项目(10zd&035) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(10JJD630002)
关键词 产权信念 公平偏好 混合博弈 实验 the belief in property rights fairness preference mixed game experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1李晓义,李建标.互惠、信任与治理效率——基于比较制度实验的研究[J].南开经济研究,2009(1):101-121. 被引量:19
  • 2夏纪军.中国的信任结构及其决定——基于一组实验的分析[J].财经研究,2005,31(6):39-51. 被引量:31
  • 3汪丁丁.产权博弈[J].经济研究,1996,31(10):70-80. 被引量:110
  • 4Barzel Yoram.Economic Analysis of Property Rights[]..1989
  • 5Yingyi Qian."How Reform Worked in China"[].In Search of ProsperityAnalytic Narratives on Economic Growth.2003
  • 6Camerer CF,Loewenstein G,Prelec D.Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics[].Journal of Econometrics.2005
  • 7Demsetz H.Toward a theory of property rights[].The American Economist.1967
  • 8Kahneman D,Knetsch J L,Thaler RH.Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics[].Journal of Business.1986
  • 9G (u|¨)th W,van Damme E.Information,strategic behavior and fairness in ultimatum bargaining:an experimental study[].Journal of Mathematical.1998
  • 10Leliveld, M. C,van Dijk, E,van Beest, I.Initial ownership in bargaining:Introducing the giving, splitting, and taking ultimatum bargaining game[].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.2008

二级参考文献71

  • 1张维迎,柯荣住.信任及其解释:来自中国的跨省调查分析[J].经济研究,2002,37(10):59-70. 被引量:982
  • 2杨中芳,彭泗清.中国人人际信任的概念化:一个人际关系的观点[J].社会学研究,1999(2):3-23. 被引量:559
  • 3杨宜音.“自己人”:信任建构过程的个案研究[J].社会学研究,1999(2):40-54. 被引量:227
  • 4王飞雪,山岸俊男.信任的中、日、美比较研究[J].社会学研究,1999(2):69-84. 被引量:149
  • 5Dufwenberg,Martin, Kirchsteiger,Georg. "A Theory of Sequential Reciprocity" [J]. Games and Economic Behavior,2004,47:268-98.
  • 6Fehr,Emst, Gachter,Simon. "Do Incentive Contracts Undermine Voluntary Cooperation" [M]. Working Paper No. 34,Institute for Empirical Research in Economics,University of Zurich,2002.
  • 7Fehr,Emst,Fischbacher. Urs, "Why Social Preference Matter ;The Impact of Non-selfish Motives on Competition,Cooperation and Incentives" [J]. The Economic Journal,2002,112 (478) : 1-33.
  • 8Fehr,Ernst ,Fischbacher,Urs ,et al. "Do High Stakes and Competition Undermine Fairness? Evidence from Russia" [M]. Working Paper No. 120,Institute for Empirical Research in Economics,University of Zurich,2002.
  • 9Fehr,Ernst,Klein,A., Schmidt,Klaus M. "Fairness and Contract Design" [J]. Econometrica, 2007,75 (1) : 121-54.
  • 10Fehr,Emst, Schmidt,Klaus M. "A Theory of Fairness ,Competition and Cooperation" [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999,114 (3) : 817-68.

共引文献156

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部