期刊文献+

基于模型检验的飞机系统安全性分析方法研究 被引量:6

Research for aircraft system safety analysis method based on model checking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的安全性分析方法,受到分析人员自身技能和经验等因素的影响,容易疏漏系统的失效状态或误判失效的影响。模型检验利用遍历算法,既可以从数学上保证搜索出系统的所有状态,不会发生疏漏;又可以利用计算机检验工具,实现自动分析过程,减少对分析人员技能和经验的依赖。将模型检验引入飞机系统安全性领域,提出了一种基于模型检验的安全性分析方法,以SAE ARP 4761标准附录中的机轮刹车系统为例,利用模型检验工具NuSMV对其安全性进行了分析,自动识别出导致某系统顶事件发生的最小失效组合,完成了传统故障树分析的目的。 Traditional system safety analysis,influenced by the personal skills and experiences of analyzers,may cause the error of system failure states and failure effects.Model checking,by means of traversing algorithm,can search all system status in mathematical method without omitting.By using the verification tool,analysis process can be conducted automatically and the dependence of experiences can be reduced.Model checking is introduced into aircraft system safety analysis in this paper and its application process is presented as well.The wheel brake system in the appendix of SAE ARP 4761 is taken as an example.With verification tool NuSMV,the minimum failure combination which lead to the top event can be got automatically,the purpose of fault tree analysis can be achieved at the same time.
出处 《中国民航大学学报》 CAS 2012年第2期17-20,共4页 Journal of Civil Aviation University of China
关键词 飞机系统 安全性分析方法 模型检验 NUSMV aircraft system safety analysis model checking NuSMV
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1CCAR-25-R3,运输类飞机适航标准[S].中国民用航空总局,2005.
  • 2CCAR-23-R3,正常类、实用类、特技类和通勤类飞机适航规定[S].中国民用航空总局,2005.
  • 3CCAR-29-R1,运输类旋翼航空器适航规定[S].中国民用航空总局,2002.
  • 4CCAR-27-R1,正常类旋翼航空器适航规定[S].中国民用航空总局,2002.
  • 5JOHN RUSHBY.Formalism in Safety Cases[C]//Making Systems Safer.London:Springer-Verlag London Limited,2010:3-17.
  • 6魡KERLUND O,BIEBER P,B魻DE E,et al.ESACS:an IntegratedMethodology for Design and Safety Analysis of Complex Systems[C]//European Safety and Reliability Conference(ESREL).Toulouse:Balke-ma publisher,2003:203-221.
  • 7魡KERLUND O,BIEBER P,B魻DE E,et al.ISAAC,a Framework forIntegrated Safety Analysis of Functional,Geometrical and Human Aspects[C]//Electronic Reciprocal Transfer System,Toulouse.France:2006:145-162.
  • 8VAL魪RIE SARTOR,JEAN GAUTHIER.Model Based Safety Assess-ment In Dassault Aviation[C]//Model-based Safety Assessmen(t Journ-ées MISSA):2010,12:11-15.
  • 9LAURENT SAGASPE NICOLAS MAY.MBSA in Aeronautics Experi-ence Feed-back on modelling applications[C]//Model Based SafetyAssessment Workshop(MBSAW2011),Toulouse.France:2011:53-59.
  • 10ANJALI JOSHI,MICHAEL W WHALEN,MATS P E HEIMDAHL.Model-Based Safety Analysis Final Report[R].NASA/CR-2006-213953,NASA Contractor Report,2006.

共引文献1

同被引文献35

  • 1何理,石杰红,胥旋,刘晶晶.RAMS在城市轨道交通信号系统安全评估中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(S01):10-14. 被引量:5
  • 2Gomes A, Mota A, Sampaio A, et al. Constructive model-based analysis for safety assessment [J]. Springer-Verlag, 2012 (14) : 673-702.
  • 3Bozzano M, Villafiorita A, Akertund O, et al. ESACS: an integrated methodology for design and safety analysis of complex systems. [C]. In proceedings of ESREL, Balkema publisher, 2003.
  • 4Akerlund O, Bierber P, Boede E. ISAAC, a framework for integrated safety analysis of functional, geometrical and human asepects[R]. In proceedings of ERTS, Toulouse, 2006.
  • 5Sartor V, Gauthier J. Model based safety assessment in dassauh aviation. [A]. In: Model-based Safety Assessment (Journ es MISSA)[C|, 2010.
  • 6Joshi A, Miller S P, Whalen M, et al. A proposal for model-based safety analysis[C]. 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Washington, D.C., 2005.
  • 7Joshi A, Heimdahl M P E. Model-based safety analysis of simulink models using SCADE design verifer[A]. 24th Internati.onal Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security[C], 2005.
  • 8Cavada R, Cimatti A, Keighren G, et al. NuSMV 2.5 Manual[EB/ OL]. Italy: FBK, 2010.
  • 9严仰光.航空航天器供电系统[M].南京:南京航空航天大学出版社.2010.
  • 10AC/AMJ 25.1309, System Design mad Analysis (Draft ARSENALre- vised) [S]. Federal Aviation Administration and European Aviation Safety Agency, 2002.

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部