摘要
目的:比较经皮肾镜取石术(percutaneous nephrolithotripsy,PNL)和开放手术治疗鹿角形肾结石的疗效。方法:2003年1月-2011年5月我院对102例鹿角形肾结石分别采用开放手术(n=48)和PNL(n=54),比较2组术中、术后情况。结果 :PNL组的手术时间(73.6±14.8)min明显短于开放手术组(146.7±18.2)min(P<0.05);PNL组的术中出血量(84.7±26.7)ml明显少于开放手术组(287.1±48.6)ml(P<0.05);PNL组的下地活动时间(3.2±0.6)d明显短于开放手术组(20.7±1.8)d(P<0.05);PNL组的肠功能恢复时间(6.8±1.1)h明显短于开放手术组(40.5±6.6)h(P<0.05);PNL组的术后住院时间(4.2±1.6)d明显短于开放手术组(14.3±2.8)d(P<0.05)。结论:与开放手术相比,PNL具有创伤小、出血少、恢复快等优点,为鹿角形肾结石提供了微创手术的新方式。
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy(PNL) and open surgery for staghorn nephrolithiasis.Methods: From January 2003 to May 2011,we underwent open surgery(n=48) and PNL(n=54) for 102 patients with staghorn nephrolithiasis.The procedure was compared in and after the operation.Results: The operation time in PNL(73.6±14.8) min was obviously shorter than open surgery(146.7±18.2)min(P0.05);The blood loss in PNL(84.7±26.7) ml was obviously less than that in open surgery(287.1±48.6)ml(P0.05);The post-operation activities in PNL(3.2±0.6) d was obviously shorter than open surgery(20.7±1.8) d(P0.05);The recovery time of gastro-intestinal function in PNL(6.8±1.1) h was obviously shorter than open surgery(40.5±6.6) h(P0.05);The post-operation hospital stay in PNL(4.2±1.6) d was obviously shorter than open surgery(14.3±2.8) d(P0.05).Conclusion: Comparing with open surgery,PNL has less trauma,less blood loss and quicker recovery.The PNL is a new mini-invasive method to staghorn nephrolithiasis.
出处
《现代肿瘤医学》
CAS
2012年第5期994-996,共3页
Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词
经皮肾镜取石术
鹿角形肾结石
开放手术
percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
staghorn nephrolithiasis
open surgery