摘要
两高三部于2010年9月13日联合签发的《关于规范量刑程序若干问题的意见(试行)》在中国确立了相对独立的量刑程序模式,并对相关机关的职责、量刑程序、当事人的权利保障等问题进行了较为全面的规定。但该意见存在不能有效保障被告人不认罪案件中被告人的量刑参与权和辩护权的缺陷,从而可能对司法公正与人权保障造成负面影响。解决这一问题的途径是在坚持相对独立的量刑模式的前提下,确立"先定罪、后量刑"的两步式庭审程序,并进行被告人不认罪案件量刑程序的构建。
Since "Opinion on Some Problems in Regulating the Sentencing Program(in trial)" has been issued on September 13,2010 by "two Supremes and three Ministries"(Supreme People's Court,Supreme People's Procuratorate,Ministry of Public Security,Ministry of State Security and Ministry of Justice),China has established the relatively independent sentencing program mode,and made comprehensive provisions for relevant authority duty,sentencing procedures and the right guarantee of parties,etc.However,there exists the defect of not effectively guaranteeing the defendant' s rights of sentencing participation and defense in the case of the defendants' pleading innocence.This may exert adverse influence on the protection of human rights and judicial justice.The solution to this problem is the two-step court proceeding called "sentencing after the conviction",which is set on the premise of a relatively independent sentencing mode and the construction of sentence procedure of defendants' pleading innocence.
出处
《安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2012年第1期35-40,共6页
Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science
基金
安徽大学"211工程"三期学术创新团队建设项目"宽严相济视野下中国刑事法律制度研究"(SKTD002B)
关键词
相对独立
量刑程序模式
被告人不认罪
辩护权
量刑程序
relatively independent
sentencing program mode
defendants' pleading innocence
the right of defense
sentencing program