期刊文献+

逻辑悖论与批判性思维 被引量:3

Logical Paradox and Critical Thinking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 批判性思维既用来指一套可以由逻辑学或类似课程所提供的具体思维技能和方法,也用来指一种思维方式和思维习惯。发现和清理逻辑悖论既需要使用和遵循批判性思维的具体方法,也需要具备批判性思维的方式和习惯。由于逻辑悖论是一种特殊的逻辑矛盾,对它们的清理往往会促成相关理论的重大创新,从而体现批判性思维与创造性思维的关联。解悖式思维是批判性思维的一种极致表现,引导这样一种思维方式既有助于批判性思维技能和方法的训练,也有助于批判性思维方式与人生态度的培育。 Critical Thinking means not only a series of concrete thinking skills and methods that can be gained by Logic course or other similar courses,but also a kind of thinking mode and habit.To discover and solve logical paradoxes need both to use and follow those methods of critical thinking,and possess those critical thinking modes and habits.As a special logical contradiction,the resolve of logical paradox can usually contribute to important creation for relevant theories,and then embody the relation between critical thinking and creative thinking.Paradox-solving thinking is the extreme representation of critical thinking,and leading this mode of thinking can not only help to train skill and methods of critical thinking,but also to cultivate a good thinking mode and attitude for life.
出处 《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期6-10,共5页 Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 河北省社会科学基金项目(HB2011QR79)
关键词 逻辑悖论 逻辑矛盾 批判性思维 解悖式思维 Logical paradox Logical contradiction Critical Thinking Paradox-solving thinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1约翰.伍兹,刘叶涛.实用逻辑的新领域[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,44(1):17-26. 被引量:7
  • 2刘叶涛.批判性思维及其社会文化功能[J].学术论坛,2009,32(9):30-33. 被引量:20
  • 3斯蒂芬·里德.对逻辑的思考[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998.
  • 4R. M. Sainsbury. Paradoxes[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1996 : 1-2.
  • 5H. Herzberger. Naive Semantics and the Liar Paradox[J]. The Journal of Philosophy,Vol.79(1982)1479.

二级参考文献32

  • 1胡锦涛.坚持走中国特色自主创新道路为建设创新型国家而努力奋斗[J].辽宁科技参考,2006(2):1-1. 被引量:63
  • 2陈慕泽.逻辑的非形式转向[J].河池学院学报,2006,26(1):23-27. 被引量:16
  • 3约翰.伍兹,刘叶涛.实用逻辑的新领域[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,44(1):17-26. 被引量:7
  • 4D. M. Gabbay, F. Guenthner. Handbook of Philosophical Logic[M].V. 13. Springer. 2005.
  • 5张建军.真正重视“逻先生”[N].人民日报,2002—01—12.
  • 6Axelrod. Robert Axelrod. The Evolution of Cooperation[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1975.
  • 7Axsom, Yates and Chaiken. D.S. Axsom, S. Yates,and S. Chaiken, "Audience response as a heuristic case in persuasion" [ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (1987): 30-40.
  • 8Bruza, Widdows and Woods. Peter Bruza, Dominic Widdows and John Woods, "A quantum logic of down below". In Handbook of Quantum Logic, edited by Dov M. Gabbay and Kurt Enbesser. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland, to appear in 2007.
  • 9Cherniak. Christopher Cherniak, Minimal Rationality[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1986.
  • 10Coady, C. A.J. Coady, Testimony: A Philosophical Study[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1992.

共引文献28

同被引文献17

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部