期刊文献+

益生元对抗生素引起的肠道菌群失调的作用 被引量:18

The modulation effect of different prebiotics on intestinal flora of mice with dysbacteriosis induced by antibiotics
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价益生元菊糖和大蒜多糖在治疗肠道菌群失调中的作用。方法 72只Balb/c小鼠随机分为6组,随机取出12只作为正常对照组,其余灌胃盐酸林可霉素和头孢曲松钠混合抗生素溶液3 d,建立小鼠肠道失调模型后,以生理盐水灌胃作为自然恢复组,其余4组分别灌胃菊糖、低剂量大蒜多糖、高剂量大蒜多糖以及丽珠肠乐5 d。受试小鼠无菌取粪,观察各组肠道菌群的数量变化、测量血清IgG,粪便内毒素含量、有机酸含量变化。结果菊糖和大蒜多糖高剂量灌胃能加速恢复抗生素导致的小鼠肠道菌群失调,这两种益生元对内毒素的清理、免疫力的恢复也有积极的效果,效果均优于丽珠肠乐和自动恢复。结论益生元有加快肠道菌群恢复和降低抗生素的破坏效果,有益于小鼠肠道健康。 Objective To study the impact of inulin and garlic polysaccharides on intestinal flora of mice with dysbacteriosis induced by antibiotics.Method 12 mice taken randomly from 72 SPF Balb/c mice were used as controls;The remaining 60 were given gastric perfusion of lincomycin hydrochloride and ceftriaxone sodium,twice daily,for continuous 3 days to induce mouse intestinal microdysbiosis.On the fourth day,all 60 mice were randomly divided into 5 groups-inulin,high-dose garlic polysaccharides,low-dose garlic polysaccharides,Lizhuchangle and natural recovery group,and given modulating treatment with the corresponding drugs respectively for continuous 5 days;The natural recovery group was treated with saline.Result Compared with the natural recovery group,both inulin and high-dose garlic polysaccharides groups showed their abilities to promote the growth of normal intestinal flora,improve acid content,lower the endotoxin level and effectively increase IgG level(P0.05).However,low-dose garlic polysaccharides and Lizhuchangle were less effective.Conclusion Both inulin and garlic polysaccharides at high dose have prebiotic effects on intestinal microflora imbalance induced by antibiotics in mice.
出处 《中国微生态学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2012年第4期318-320,323,共4页 Chinese Journal of Microecology
关键词 益生元 菌群失调 抗生素 Prebiotics Enteric dysbacteriosis Antibiotics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

  • 1诸葛健 王正祥.工业微生物实验技术手册[M].中国轻工业出版社,1997..
  • 2康白.微生态学原理[M].大连:大连出版社,2002.180.
  • 3张日俊.单胃动物消化道微生态环境与营养[A].何明清主编.动物微生态研究进展[C].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2000.140-154.
  • 4张日俊.营养微生态学[A].康白主编.微生态学原理[C].大连:大连出版社,2002.53-72.
  • 5Gibson G R, Macfarlane G T. Human Colonic Bacteria:Role in Nutrition, Physiology and Pathology[M]. Boca Raton Lodon Tokyo: CRC Press, 1995.
  • 6Fuller R. A Review: Probioties in man and animals[J].Journal of Applied Baeteriology, 1989, 66:365-378.
  • 7Kailasapathy K, Chin J. Survival and therapeutic potential of probiotic organism with reference to Lactobacilli acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp [J]. Immunology and cell Biology, 2000,78:80-88.
  • 8Pietras M, Skraba B. Effect of a probiotic on resistance and rearing performance of broiler chickens. 50 Years of the National Research Institute of Animal Production "Safe Food as a Challenge to Animal Sciences" Balice,2000. Research reports. Ⅱ. Effect of environmental factors on the quality of animal product[R]. Roczniki Naukowe Zootechniki. Supplement. 2000, 6:357-361.
  • 9Raman M, Sharma D D, Malik R. Influence of mixed probiotic on growth, feed conversion efficiency and incidence of diarrhoea in young calves[J]. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 1998, 15(3):228-231.
  • 10Abe F, Ishibashi N, Shimamura S. Effect of administration of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria to newborn calves and piglets [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1995,78(12):2838-2846.

共引文献61

同被引文献263

引证文献18

二级引证文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部