期刊文献+

土壤重金属元素检测国际实验室比对研究 被引量:2

International Comparison of the Heavy Metals Testing in Soil
下载PDF
导出
摘要 IERM和CNAS合作组织开展了亚太实验室合作组织(APLAC)能力验证计划"APLAC T066土壤重金属元素检测",其目的是评价参加实验室定量分析土壤重金属元素总量的能力。研究所用的能力验证样品为IERM研制的土壤标准样品。结果表明,参加实验室检测土壤砷、铜、汞、镍、铅和锌的结果满意率分别为85.7%、95.8%、77.1%、83.3%、93.5%和91.7%。样品消解过程加入氢氟酸时,铅和锌的检测结果与标准值更加接近,说明检测土壤重金属元素总量时氢氟酸的加入非常关键。文章还对比对实验室结果评价的统计方法进行了探讨。 Asia Pacific Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation(APLAC) Proficiency testing programme "Total Heavy Metal Elements in Soil" was organized by IERM and CNAS.The objective of the programme was to assess the actual performance of the participating laboratories on quantitative testing trace elements in soil.The test soil sample used in this programme was the soil CRM produced by IERM.The result of this work showed that the satisfactory rates of the participant laboratories testing arsenic,copper,mercury,nickel,lead and zinc in soil were 85.7%,95.8%,77.1%,83.3%,93.5% and 91.7%,respectively.When soil sample was digested with HF mixed strong acid,the concentrations of lead and zinc were closer to the certified value,which indicated that HF was essential in soil sample digesting when total heavy metal elements were analyzed.The statistic method used in inter-laboratories comparison study was also discussed in this paper.
出处 《中国环境监测》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期18-23,共6页 Environmental Monitoring in China
基金 亚太实验室认可合作组织(APLAC)立项并提供资助
关键词 土壤 重金属元素 实验室间比对 Soil Heavy metals Inter-laboratories comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Ioan Suciu,Constantin Cosma,Mihai Todic,et al.Analysis of soil heavy metal pollution and pattern in centraltransylvania[J].Int J Mol Sci,2008,9:434-453.
  • 2De Vries W,Romkens P F,Schutze G.Critical soilconcentrations of cadmium,lead,and mercury in viewof health effects on humans and animals[J].Reviewsof Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,2007,191:91-130.
  • 3Pandey J,Pandey U.Accumulation of heavy metals indietary vegetables and cultivated soil horizon in organicfarming system in relation to atmospheric deposition in aseasonally dry tropical region of India[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2008,148(1-4):61-74.
  • 4Peter R S.The performance of laboratories analysingheavy metals in the workplace analysis scheme forproficiency(WASP)[J].Ann Occup Hyg,2006,50(4):417-425.
  • 5中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS—GL03,能力验证样品均匀性和稳定性评价指南[EB/OL].
  • 6ISO 13528,Statistical Methods for Use in ProficiencyTesting by Interlaboratory Comparisons[S].

同被引文献4

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部