期刊文献+

拉莫三嗪与喹硫平治疗双相抑郁的对照研究 被引量:7

A controled study of lamotrigine Versus quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较拉莫三嗪(利必通)和喹硫平(思瑞康)治疗双相抑郁的疗效及安全性。方法对71例符合CCMD-3诊断双相障碍(目前为抑郁发作)的患者按随机、平行、对照的方法分为拉莫三嗪组和喹硫平组,观察8周,分别于第0、2、4、6、8周末用HAMD、CGI评价疗效,于第2、4、6、8周末用TESS评定不良反应,于第4、8周末用BRMS评定躁狂症状。结果拉莫三嗪组的痊愈率34.21%,有效率65.79%,喹硫平组的痊愈率39.39%,有效率69.70%。两组疗效比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),两组不良反应发生率相当。结论拉莫三嗪和喹硫平均可首选用于双相抑郁治疗,且安全性、不良反应相当。 OBJECTIVE To compare both the efficacy and safety of lamotrigine(Lamictal) and quetiapine(Seroquel) in the treatment of bipolar depression.METHODS 71 patients who met the CCMD-3 diagnosis of bipolar disorder(currently depressive episode) were divided into lamotrigine group and quetiapine group in a randomized,parallel and controlled way.During the 8 weeks′ observation,assess the therapeutic effects at the end of the 0,2,4,6,8 week respectively,with HAMD and CGI.Evaluate the adverse reactions at the end of the 2,4,6,8 week respectivelywith TESS and the manic symptoms at the end of the 4 and 8 week with BRMS.RESULTS The cure rate and effectve rate of lamotrigine group are 34.21% and 65.79%,and 39.39% and 69.70% in quetiapine group.There was no significant difference(P0.05) between the two groups,which means that their adverse reaction rates were generally equivalent.CONCLUSION Lamotrigine and quetiapine are preferred for the treatment of bipolar depression,and have equivalent safety and adverse reactions.
作者 赵金龙
出处 《海峡药学》 2012年第4期67-69,共3页 Strait Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 双相抑郁 拉莫三嗪 喹硫平 Bipolar depression Lamotrigine Quetiapine
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献46

  • 1陈炯,金卫东.奎硫平在心境双相障碍中的临床应用[J].中国药物与临床,2006,6(3):218-220. 被引量:16
  • 2胡斌,魏波,龚发金,陈海波.非典型抗精神病药物在双相抑郁治疗中的应用[J].国际精神病学杂志,2006,33(4):243-246. 被引量:9
  • 3马永春,陈炯,金卫东.拉莫三嗪对双相抑郁的治疗与预防[J].上海精神医学,2006,18(5):295-296. 被引量:6
  • 4Kusumakar v, Yatham LN. An Open study of lamotrigine in refractory bipolar depression[J].Psychiatry Res, 1997, 72: 145-148.
  • 5Barbee JG, Jamhour NJ.Lamotrigine as an augmentation agent in treatment-resistantdepression[J].J Clin Psychiatry, 2002, 63: 737-741.
  • 6Calabrese JR, Keck PE JR, Macfadden W, et al. A randomized, double - blind, placebo - controlled trial of quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar I or II depression [ J ]. Am J Psychiatry, 2005, 162 (7): 1351 - 1360.
  • 7Suppes T, Kelly DI, Keck PE JR, et al. Qoetiapine for the continuation treatment of bipolar depression: naturalistic prospective case series from the Stanley Bipolar Treatment Network [J]. Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 2007, 22 (6) : 376 -381.
  • 8Suppes T, Hirschfeld RM, Vieta E, et al. Quetiapine for the treatment of bipolar II depression : analysis of data from two ran-domized, double - blind, placebo - controlled studies [ J ]. WoAd J Biol Psychiatry, 2008, 9 (3) : 198 -211.
  • 9Thase ME, Macfadden W, Weisler RH,et al. Efficacy of quetiapine monotherapy in bipolar i and II depression: a double - blind, placebocontrolled study ( The BOLDER II Study) [ J ]. J Clin Psychopharmacol, 2006, 26(6) :600 - 609.
  • 10Thase ME, MacfaddenW, Weisler RH, et al. Efficacy of quetiapine monotherapy in bipolar I or II depression: a double - blind, placebocontrolledstudy [ J ]. Clin Psychopharmacol, 2006, 26 (6): 600 - 609.

共引文献29

同被引文献58

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部