摘要
在前人研究的基础上,对中国大衍求一术、印度库塔卡和西方哥廷根抄本这三种古代一次不定分析算法进行全面的数理分析和比较,得出结论:大衍求一术、库塔卡是成熟的算法,哥廷根法是试探法.
On the basis of previous studies,and we take the comprehensive mathematical analysis and comparison on three kinds of typical indeterminate analysis algorithm such as the DAYANQIUYISHU(a algorithm of solution to congruence),Kuttaka(a algorithm of indeterminate equations of the first degree) and the algorithm in transcript of Getinggen,and then the conclusion can be obtained that the first two were mature algorithms while the latter was only a try.
出处
《湖南理工学院学报(自然科学版)》
CAS
2012年第1期20-24,共5页
Journal of Hunan Institute of Science and Technology(Natural Sciences)
基金
2011年度湖南省大学生研究性学习和创新性实验计划项目
关键词
不定分析
同余式
算法
对比研究
indeterminate analysis
congruence
algorithm
comparative research