期刊文献+

反垄断法私人实施制度的价值 被引量:2

The Value of Private Antitrust Enforcement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反垄断法实施制度的运行目标和功能主要是对理性行为主体的威慑、为垄断违法行为导致的危害后果提供救济,以及解释、明确反垄断法针对对象的范围和实施标准。私人实施在实现这三个目标和功能方面有着十分特殊的价值。我国反垄断法的私人实施制度相关规则有待进一步的细化和完善,在此过程中应当注重明确反垄断法实施的目标和功能,规则制定要具有科学性、前瞻性,同时注意把握私人实施与公共实施之间的互动关系。 The major functions and objectives of antitrust enforcement are deterrence and remediation in addition to explanation and clarification of the antitrust law and its application standards. Private action has a particular impact on the achievement of the three goals. China' s private antitrust enforcement needs further refinement and improvement. During the process, a clear understanding of the objectives and func- tions of the antitrust enforcement is needed. Rules should be formulated with a scientific and forward-loo- king perspective, paying attention to the interaction between the private and public sectors of antitrust en- forcement.
作者 柳镭
机构地区 湖南理工学院
出处 《西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2012年第2期23-28,共6页 Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
关键词 反垄断法 私人实施制度 威慑 救济 明晰 :Antitrust Law Private Enforcement Deterrence Remediation Clarification
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 112 Cong. Rec. 2455ff, 1890[Z].
  • 251 Cong. Ree. 3148, 1890[Z].
  • 3Becker, Gary S. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Ap- proach [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1968, 76 : 169.
  • 4Calabresi, Guido. The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and E- conomic Analysis[M]. New Haven and London: Yale Uni- versity Press, 1970.
  • 5Shavell, Steven. Economic Analysis of Accident Law[ M ]. Cambridge, Massachusets; London, England: Harvard Uni- versity Press, 1987.
  • 6Landes, William M., Richard A. Posner. The Economic Structure of Tort Law[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni- versity Press, 1987.
  • 7Landes, William M. Optimal Sanctions for Antitrust Viola- tions[J]. University of Chicago Law Review, 1983, 50: 652, 655.
  • 8Becker, Gary S., George J. Stigler. Law Enforcement, Malfeasance and Compensation of Enforcers [ J ]. Journal of Legal Studies, 1974, 3 : 1.
  • 9Hawaii v. Standard Oil 405 U. S. , 251, 262, 1972[Z].
  • 10Hayek, Friedrich. The Use of Knowledge in Society [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1945, 35: 4.

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部