期刊文献+

肛垫悬吊固定术与外剥内扎术治疗混合痔的疗效研究 被引量:15

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨肛垫悬吊固定术治疗混合痔的临床疗效和应用价值。方法采用随机对照前瞻性研究将消痔灵(与生理盐水按1∶1混合)注射到直肠黏膜下及直肠周围间隙进行肛垫悬吊固定治疗混合痔60例为观察组,外剥内扎术60例为对照组,观察两组治疗后的治愈率、并发症及复发率。结果观察组一次治愈59例(98.3%),1例好转(1.7%),经再次肛垫悬吊固定痊愈。住院时间3~29d,平均7d。术后少量出血5例(8.3%);轻度疼痛15例(25%),中度疼痛1例(1.7%);肛缘轻度水肿5例(8.3%),中度水肿1例(1.7%);肛门轻度坠胀22例(36.7%);尿潴留留置导尿16例(26.7%);感染、肛门狭窄、肛门失禁均无发生。门诊随访6~30个月复发率为0。对照组一次治愈55例(91.7%),2例好转(3.3%),经再次治疗痊愈,3例术后未愈(5%)。住院时间3~15d,平均7.5d。术后少量出血16例(26.7%)。轻度疼痛22例(36.7%),中度疼痛9例(15%),重度疼痛2例(3.3%)。肛缘轻度水肿19例(31.7%),中度水肿3例(5%),重度水肿1例(1.7%)。肛门轻度坠胀27例(45%),中度坠胀9例(15%)。尿潴留留置尿管22例(36.7%)。感染无发生。肛门轻度狭窄、不全性失禁各3例(5%),门诊随访6~30个月复发2例(3.3%)。治疗组术后出血、疼痛、肛缘水肿、肛门坠胀并发症发生与对照组比较差异有统计学意义。结论肛垫悬吊固定术治疗混合痔能有效地使肛垫上提固定,消除出血、脱出等主要症状,肛门功能保存完好。其临床疗效与外剥内扎术无明显差别,术后并发症及复发率低,具有创伤小,疼痛轻微,操作简单、安全,近期疗效确切的优点。
出处 《结直肠肛门外科》 2012年第1期34-37,共4页 Journal of Colorectal & Anal Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Shao WJ,Li GC, Zhang ZH,et al. Systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy [J]. Br J Surg, 2008,95 (2) : 147- 160.
  • 2Burch J,Epstein D,Baba Akbari A, et al. Stapled haemorrhoideetomy (haemorrhoidopexy) for the treat ment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review and eco nomic evaluation [J]. Health Technol Assess, 2008, 12 (8):191-193.
  • 3E. Zacharakis, D. Kanellos, M. G. Pramateftakis, et al. Long term results after stapled haemorrhoida: a prospective study with median follow up of 6 years [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2007,11 (2) : 144- 147.
  • 4痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2138
  • 5Milligan ETC, Morgan CN, Nanton LE. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and the operative treatment of hemorrhoids[J]. Lancet, 19 3 7,2 : 1119.
  • 6Lord PB, Kamm MA, Nichols R J, et al. Hemorrhoids.. pathology, pathophysiology and etiology [J]. Br J Surg, 1994,81 (7) : 946-954.
  • 7Ho YH,Cheong WK,Tsang C,et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy-cast and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000 : 43 (12): 1666-1675.
  • 8Rowsell M,Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy :randomized controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2000 ; 355 (9206) : 779-781.
  • 9Pope V, Doran H, Fearn S, et al. Randomized, controlled trial comparing quality of life after open haemorrhoidectomy (OH) plus stapled anopexy(SA) [J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2001,44(4) : 5.
  • 10Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reducation of mucosa and hemorroidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure [C]. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, 1998: 777-784.

共引文献2137

同被引文献115

引证文献15

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部