期刊文献+

霸权依赖与领导国家权势衰落的逻辑 被引量:12

Hegemonic Dependence and the Logic in the Declining Ascendance of Leading Powers
原文传递
导出
摘要 在国际关系历史上,领导国家的衰落无疑是一个激发学者们持久想象力的重大问题。作者在已有研究的基础上尝试从一个新的理论视角,即霸权依赖的分析路径探讨领导国家衰落的根源。其核心假设是,领导国家的权势衰落源于其拥有霸权本身,对霸权的过度依赖导致领导国家不可避免地走向了衰落。作者认为,领导国家通过建立霸权成为了既定国际体系中的"收租人",垄断着国际财富资源的分配,但大规模的财富资源也导致了领导国家内部需求的膨胀。当自身实力不足以支撑这种刚性需求时,领导国家转而通过进一步控制霸权来获取资源、转移矛盾;而边缘国家的"顺从"则为领导国家的对外剥削提供了"合法"支持,从而导致了领导国家霸权依赖局面的生成。随着霸权依赖程度的加深,领导国家的内部性质逐渐发生蜕变,其对外行为则日益从现状满意变得具有进攻性进而陷入到过度扩张的陷阱之中。由于边缘地带中新兴大国的崛起,领导国家的权势地位呈现出相对衰落的趋势,开启了国际权力从集中走向分散的历史进程。 In the history of international relations,the fall of leading powers is undoubtedly the most fascinating topic fueled the lasting imagination of scholars.The author argues that the declining ascendance of leading powers is rooted in their too much dependence on hegemony.Through the building of hegemony,the leading powers became 'rent collector' in the established international system and monopolized the allocation of international wealth and resources.However,the large-scale wealth and resources would lead to rapidly increasing demands within the leading powers,and eventually drive the leading powers to grab more resources by making use of its hegemony;meanwhile,'the submission' of periphery countries provided the 'legitimacy' for the leading powers' external exploitation.With deepening hegemonic dependence,the internal nature of leading powers began to change and the external behavior became more aggressive,falling into an over-extension trap.Thus,the rise of emerging powers and the relative decline of the leading powers initiated the historical process of international power shift from concentration to decentralization.
作者 刘世强
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期21-41,156-157,共21页 World Economics and Politics
基金 教育部2011年度博士研究生学术新人奖项目的资助
关键词 领导国家 霸权依赖 性质蜕变 权势衰落 leading powers,hegemonic dependence,nature metamorphosis,ascendance decline
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Jacqueline de Romilly, The Rise and Fall of States According to Greek Authors, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997, p. 19.
  • 2Karen Rasler and William R. Thompson, "Technological Innovation, Capability Positional Shifts, and Systemic War," The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1991, p. 420.
  • 3Mark Elfin, The Pattern of the Chinese Past, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1973, p. 314.
  • 4罗伯特·吉尔平著,宋新宁,杜建平译.《世界政治中的战争与变革》,上海:上海人民出版社2007年版,第180页.
  • 5阿诺德·汤因比著,郭小凌等译.《历史研究》(上卷),上海:上海世纪出版集团2005年版,第257-262页.
  • 6Carlo M. Cipolla, ed., The Economic Decline of Empires, London: Methuen, 1970, p. 5.
  • 7Harold Sprout and Margaret Sprout, "The Dilemma of Rising Demands and Insufficient Resources," World Politics, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1968, pp. 660-693.
  • 8保罗·肯尼迪著,王保存等译.《大国的兴衰--1500-2000年的经济变迁与军事冲突》,北京:求实出版社1989年版,第2页.
  • 9Karen Rasler and William R. Thompson, "Relative Decline and the Overconsumption-Underinvestment Hypothesis," International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1991, pp. 273-294.
  • 10汉斯·摩根索著,徐昕,郝望,李保平译.《国家间政治--权力斗争与和平》,北京:北京大学出版社2006年版,第205页.

二级参考文献40

  • 1[美]亚历山大·温特著 秦亚青译.《国际政治的社会理论》[M].上海人民出版社,2000年.198-229,281-290.
  • 2[美]汉斯·摩根索著 卢明华译.《国际纵横策论》[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1995年版.第3页.
  • 3[美]汉斯·摩根索.《国际纵横策论》[M].,.第36页.
  • 4Martin Wight,"The Balance of Power and International Order"in Allan James,eds.,The Bases of International Order,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1973,p.97.
  • 5David Hume,"Of the Balance of Power",in John Vasques,eds.,Classics of International Relations,Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall,1986,p.282.
  • 6Michael Sheehan,THe Balance of Power,New York:Routledge,1996,p.193.
  • 7Hedley Bull,The Anarchical Society,New York:Columbia University Press,1995,p.97.
  • 8Henry Kissinger,Diplomacy,New York:Simon & Schuster,1994,pp.21-22.
  • 9Thomas Christensen & Jack Snyder,"Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks",International Organization,Vol.44,No.1,1990,pp.137-139.
  • 10Robert Powell,"Anarchy in International Relations Theory",International Organization,Vol.48,No.1,1994,pp.313-344.

共引文献62

同被引文献241

引证文献12

二级引证文献134

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部