期刊文献+

企业家社会资本对战略变革的刚性约束研究 被引量:6

Rigid Restriction of Entrepreneurial Social Capital on Strategic Change
下载PDF
导出
摘要 转型经济时期,企业家社会资本作为尚未成熟的市场机制的重要补充而受到广泛重视。但是当企业绩效降低,需要进行战略变革时,具有主观不确定性心理假设的企业家更容易与相似的个体产生互动,构建的关于战略变革的战略讨论网络结构更紧密、连带更强、规模更小。企业家战略讨论网络的结构作为一种重要的社会资本,一方面通过情感性社会支持帮助企业家坚定现有战略信念;另一方面限制了企业家战略图示的复杂程度,带来企业家关于战略变革的认知惰性,最终对企业战略变革带来刚性约束。 During the transitional economy period,the entrepreneurial social capital has been attached great importance as the complementary of the immature market mechanism.However,when the corporative performance falls,needing the strategic change,the enterprisers with subjective uncertainty will easily arouse mutual contact with similar individuals.The structure of their strategic discussion network will be closer,stronger,and smaller.This structure of strategic discussion network as an important social capital will give emotional social support to confirm the entrepreneurial strategy in existence,as well as restrict the entrepreneurial complexity of entrepreneurial strategy scheme,therefore bringing the cognitive inertia about strategic change,and ultimately leading to the rigid restriction to the corporative strategic change.
作者 李健 陈传明
出处 《江海学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期97-103,238,共7页 Jianghai Academic Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"企业家社会资本 战略过程与企业绩效"(项目号:71172058)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1陈传明,陈松涛.高层管理团队战略调整能力研究——认知的视角[J].江海学刊,2007(1):213-219. 被引量:18
  • 2McDonald,M.L.and Westpha,J.D.,“Getting by with the Advice Networks and Firms’Strategic Responses to Poor Performance”,Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,48,pp.1-32.
  • 3Cho,T.S.and Hambrick,D.C.,“Attention as The Mediator Between Top Management Team Characteristics and Strategic Change:The Case of Airline Deregulation”,Organizations Sci-ence,2006,4,pp.453-469.
  • 4Lant,T.K.,Milliken,F.J.and Batra,B.,“The Role of Managerial Learning and Interpretation in Strategic Persistence and Reorientation:An Empirical Exploration”,Strategic Man-agement Journal,1992,13,pp.585-608.
  • 5Wiersema,M.F.and Bantel,K.A.,“Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change”,Academy of Management Journal,1992,35,pp.91-121.
  • 6Porac,J.F.,Wade,J.B.and Pollock,T.G.,“Industry Categories and The Politics of The Comparable Firm in CEO Compensation”,Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44,pp.112-144.
  • 7Mullin,B.A.and Hogg,M.A.,“Motivations for Group Membership:The Role of Subjective Importance and Uncertainty Reduction”,Basic and Applied Social Psychology,1999,21,pp.91-102.
  • 8Heider,F.,The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations,New York,Wiley,1958.
  • 9Ingram,P.and Roberts,P.W.,“Friendships among Competitors in The Sydney Hotel Industry”,American Journal of Sociology,2000,106,pp.387-423.
  • 10Uzzi,B.,“The Sources and Consequences of Embeddness for The Economic Performance of Organizations”,American Sociological Review,1996,61,pp.674-698.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Bantel, K. A and Jackson, S. E. ( 1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of top team make a difference? Strategic Management Jounal, 10:pp. 107 - 124.
  • 2Boeker, W. (1997). Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40:pp. 152 -170.
  • 3Van Wijk, R., Van den Bosch, F. & Volberda, H. (2001). The impact of knowledge depth and breadth of absorbed knowledge on levels of exploration and exploitation, The Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
  • 4Miller, C. C., Burke, L. M. and Glick, W. H. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon exocutives: Implications for stratogic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19: pp. 39 - 58.
  • 5Dutton. J. E. and Jackson, S. E. (1987). Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review, 12:pp.76 - 90.
  • 6Nutt, P. C. (1986). Decision style and strategic decisions of top executives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 30:pp. 39-62.
  • 7cnamara, G. M., Luce. R. A. and Tompson, G. H. (2002). Examining the effect of complexity in strategic group knowledge structures on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23 : 153- 170.
  • 8Mason, R, O. and Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions. Wiley, New York.
  • 9Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger. D. M. and Sapienza. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decisionmaking teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal. 38 : pp. 60 -84.
  • 10Schweiger. D. M., $andberg, W. R. and Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32 : pp. 745 -772.

共引文献17

同被引文献89

引证文献6

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部