竞争推进与竞争中立:政府反竞争行为规制研究

Administrative Monopoly Abuse Control in the View of Competition Advocacy and Competitive Neutrality

政府利用行政权力限制竞争之行为是很多国家普遍存在的现象。在我国大陆,政府限制竞争的现象又具有国家垄断、自然垄断和行政垄断的特殊性。针对政府反竞争行为,一般采用事后规制的路径,即竞争法或反垄断法规制。然而,法律规制并无法解决我国大陆行业行政垄断问题,且存在法律责任不明的弊端。近年来,国际上不断兴起的竞争推进和竞争中立政策则为此提供了一条事前规制的路径,是事后规制的有力补充。

It is a common phenomenon in many countries that government utilizes administrative power to restrict competition.In China,however,Administrative Monopoly Abuse（AMA） bears the mixture of national monopoly,natural monopoly,and administrative monopoly.The ex post approach,i.e.competition or antimonopoly regulation,is the common way to regulate AMA.However it is not effective regarding to AMA in China with unclear legal liabilities.The ex-ante regulation that has become increasing popular internationally for promoting the competition advocacy and competition neutrality policies,is a favorable supplement to the ex post approach.