期刊文献+

米氮平与路优泰治疗抑郁症对照研究

Study on Mirtazapine and Neurostan in the Treatment of Depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价米氮平与路优泰治疗抑郁症的疗效和不良反应。方法将符合CCM D-3抑郁症诊断标准的门诊和住院患者共60例,随机分为两组,分别给予米氮平(n=30,研究组)和路优泰(n=30,对照组),疗程6周,用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRSD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA),临床疗效总评量表的病情严重程度(CG I-S I)和副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和副反应。结果米氮平与路优泰对抑郁症疗效接近(χ2=0.232,P>0.05);但显效时间二者有显著性差异,研究组平均(4.2±1.7)天,对照组平均(11.3±4.2)天(P<0.01);副反应无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论米氮平是一种安全有效的新一代抗抑郁药。 Objective To compare the efficacy and side effects between mirtazapine and neurostan in the treatment of depression.Method A total of 60 inpatients and outpatients with a diagnosis of depression according to CCMD-3 were randomly assigned to mirtazapine group(n=30)as the research teams and neurostan group(n=30)served as controls for six weeks.Effects and side reactions were evaluated with HRSD,HAMA,CGI-SI and TESS before and after the treatment.Result The efficacy of mirtazapine was similar to that of neurostan(χ2=0.232,P0.05);There was significant difference in the effectual time between mirtazapine and neurostan group,The research group took effect on(4.2±1.7) days,the other needed(11.3±4.2) days(P〈0.01);there was no significant difference in side effect between two groups(P〈0.05);Conclusion Mirtazapine is an effective and safe antidepressant.
作者 王长奇
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2012年第4期507-509,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 精神卫生 米氮平 路优泰 抑郁症 Mental health Mirtazapine Neurostan Depression
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Kasper S. Clinical efficacy of mirtazapine: A review of meta--analy- ses of pooled data[J]. Lnt Clin Psychopharmacol, 2009,10 (4) : 25.
  • 2Zivekov M,Rose K C B,Pols A G. Efficacy of ory 3770(mirtazapine)Vs amitriptyline in patients with major depressive disorder- A meta-- analysis [J ]. Hum psychopharmacol, 2 0 0 8,10 ( 2 ) : 13 5.
  • 3Riehou H, Ruimy P, Charbaut J, et al. A multicenter, double-- blind, clomipramine--controlled efficacy and safety study of org 3770[J]. Hum Psychopharmaeol, 2010,10 : 263.
  • 4Van Moffaert M,De Wilde J,Vereechen A,et al. Mirtazapine is more effective than trazodone: A double--blind controlled study in hospi- talized patients with major depression[J]. Lnt Clin PHYCHOPHAR- MACOL, 1999,10:3.
  • 5Wheatley D p, Van Moffaere M, Timmerman L, et al. Mirtazapine : Efficacy and tolerability in comparison with {luoxetine in patients with moderate to sever major depressive disorder[J]. J Clin Psychia- try 1998,59:306.
  • 6陈广阳,古国谋,谢建文,李崇勇,付贤,肖旭曼.米氮平与文拉法辛治疗抑郁症对照研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2003,13(2):77-79. 被引量:37
  • 7!Richel Son E. The pharmacology of antidepressants at the synapse: Fans on newer compounds[J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 1994,55:9 (supply 4) :34.
  • 8Dubovsky S L,Thomas M. Serotonergic mechanisms and current and future psychiatric practice [J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 1995,56 (supply 2)-38.
  • 9De Boer T. The effects of mirtazapine on central noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotrans mission[J]. Lnt Clin Sychopharmacol, 19 9 5, 10(4):19.

二级参考文献1

共引文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部