高等教育治理模式及其经验观测维度的比较分析框架被引量：10

An Analytical Framework for Comparing Higher Education Governance Model and Empirically Observable Dimensions

导出

摘要政府中心模式、学术自治模式以及市场导向模式是高等教育治理的三种理想模式,在不同的治理模式中,大学自治权的程度和范围以及治理本质等方面存在着显著差异。通过对程序性自治维度和实质性自治维度的经验观测,可以衡量高等教育治理变化的程度和方向,为我们进行高等教育治理的国际比较提供了一种有用的分析框架。 The state-centered model, academic self-governance model and the market-oriented model are three ideal-types of higher education governance. The degree and range of university autonomy and the essence of higher education governance are quite different among the patterns. The empirically observable dimensions, such as procedural autonomy and substantive autonomy, enable us to measure the degree and direction of change for higher education governance. This provides us a useful analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance.

作者蒋洪池马媛

机构地区中国地质大学高等教育研究所

出处《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期43-47,共5页 International and Comparative Education

基金 2009年度教育部人文社会科学青年基金研究项目"中美大学内部治理中教师权力比较研究"(09YJC880099) 中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助项目"中国公立大学自主发展问题研究"(CUG090119)系列成果之一

关键词高等教育治理模式程序性自治实质性自治 higher education governance model procedural autonomy substantive autonomy

分类号 G640 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献18

1Neave, G. The Evaluative State Reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 1998,33 (3):265-284.
2Sporn, B. Responsive University Structures: An Analysis ofAdaptation to Socioeconomic Environments of US and Eu- ropean Universities. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. 1999.12.
3Braun, D. Regulierungsmodelle und Machtstrukturen an Universitaten. Die Krise der Universit-iten. Leviathan Son- derheft, 2001, (20): 243-264.
4Niklasson, L. State, Market, Hierarchy in Higher E- ducation--A Typology and an Outline of the Debate. High- er Education Management, 1995,7( 3 ):345-353.
5Neave, G., & van Vught, F. Prometheus Bound: The Chang- ing Relationship Between Government and Higher Educa- tion inWesternEurop- Oxford: PergamonPres-199 l-i-xxii.
6Neave, G. The Bologna Declaration: Some of the Historic Dilemmas Posed by the Reconstruction of the Community in Europe' s System of Higher Education. Educational Pol- icy, 2003,17( 1 ):145.
7Scott, P. Reflections on the Reform of Higher Education in Central and Eastern Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 2002,27(1-2):140-141.
8de Boer, H., & Goedegebuure, L. New Rules of the Game? Reflections on Governance, Management, and Systems Change. In J. File & L. Goedegebuure (Eds.), Real-time systems--Reflections on Higher Education in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovenia.Enschede: Logo CHEPS Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies, Uni- versity of Twente. 2003:215.
9Olsen, J. The Institutional Dynamics of the European University. In M. Peter & O. Johan (Eds.), University Dyn amics and European Integration.Dordrecht: Springer.2007: 28.54.
10Sadlak, J. In Search of the "Post-communist" Universi- ty--the Background and Scenario of the Transformation of Higher Education in Central and Eastern Europe. In K.Htifner (Ed.), Higher Education Reform Processes in Central and Eastern Europe. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1995:43-62.