期刊文献+

行政管理减排机制对企业生产策略的影响研究 被引量:2

Impacts of Administrative Scheme of Abatement on Corporations' Production Strategy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 行政管理机制是实现政府减排目标的一种重要方式,本文研究行政管理减排机制对企业生产策略及收益的影响。在企业的产品需求为随机变量的条件下,分别建立了强制减排机制和税费机制下的企业生产优化模型。通过对比两种机制下企业的最优生产策略及其期望收益的变化,表明了税费机制是一种比强制机制更有利的、促进政府减排目标实现的方式,是一种能够实现政府与企业的"双赢"机制。 Administrative scheme of carbon abatement is a very important approach to achieve government's carbon reduction goal.This paper focus on impacts of different administrative approaches on corporations' producing policy and their income.Based on the stochastic demand on their products,different optimization models are presented to decide corporations' optimal amount of products,which is to maximize their expected net income under different administrative abatement approaches.Two kinds of administrative abatement approaches,command-and-control,cap-and-penalty or cap-and-tax,are considered.By comparing the optimal amount of products and optimal expected net income in different abatement approaches,the result demonstrates that cap-and-tax or cap-and-penalty is more efficient than command-and-control in terms of expected net income.And they may lead to a "win-win" situation for both the government and corporations.
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期153-159,共7页 China Soft Science
基金 教育部博士点基金(20110036120013) 北京市社科重点项目(11JGA010) 北京市共建重点项目(GJ2011008)
关键词 碳权配额 强制机制 罚款机制 碳税机制 生产优化 carbon emission allowance command-and-control cap-and-penalty approach cap-and-tax approach production optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献111

共引文献560

同被引文献24

  • 1陈实.煤化工企业生产计划优化分析[J].化工管理,2013(14):182-182. 被引量:1
  • 2秦学礼.面向流程型企业的递阶生产优化模型及应用研究[J].南阳理工学院学报,2010,2(6):95-100. 被引量:1
  • 3Leiby P, Rubin J. Intertemporal permit trading for the control of greenhouse gas emissions [ J ]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001, 19 (3) : 229-256.
  • 4Nordhaus W D, Yang Z. A regional dynamic general- equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies [J]. The American Economic Review, 1996, 86(4): 741-765.
  • 5Benjaafar S, Li Y, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models[ J]. IEEE Transactions, 2013, 10( 1 ) : 99-116.
  • 6Liu B, He P, Zhang B, et al.. Impacts of alternative allowance allocation methods under a cap-and-trade program in power sector [ J]. Energy Policy, 2012, 60 (3) : 161-181.
  • 7Lee C F, Lin S J, Lewis C. Analysis of the impacts of combining carbon taxation and emission trading on differ- ent industry sectors[ J ]. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (2) : 722-729.
  • 8Alberola E, Chevallier J. European carbon prices and banking restrictions : evidence from Phase I(2005-2007 ) [J]. The Energy Journal, 2009, 26(2): 1-28.
  • 9Eshel D M D. Optimal allocation of tradable pollution rights and market structures [ J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2005, 28 (2) : 205-223.
  • 10Lee H, Park T, Kim B, et al.. A real option-based model for promoting sustainable energy projects under the clean development mechanism [ J ]. Energy Policy, 2012, 54(5): 360-368.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部