现行犯案件的初查措施:反思性研究——以新《刑事诉讼法》第117条对传唤、拘传的修改为切入

The Preliminary Investigation Measures for Flagrante Delicto Cases:A Reflective Study——an angle from the newly modified Article 117 of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding subpoena and issue a warrant

适应公安机关办理现行犯案件的现实需要,我国新《刑事诉讼法》第117条增设了对现行犯的口头传唤措施,但存在一定的问题。由于立法的科学性不足,当下实践中,现行犯案件中初查措施的适用乱象纷呈。现行犯案件初查中强制措施的适用既具有现实必要性,也具有理论正当性。应当将现行犯的立案程序独立设置,同时修改拘留制度,以明确被口头传唤或者无证拘留后的现行犯的犯罪嫌疑人身份,解决紧随其后的讯问行为的合法性以及讯问笔录的证据效力,消除"先侦后立"的现象。

In order to reflect to the practical needs of the public security organs in flagrante deticto cases, Article 117 of the Crim- inal Procedure Act has been modified to impose the oral summoned measures in flagrante delicto cases, however, problems re-mained. Due to lack of the scientific nature of the legislation, the current practice of preliminary investigation measures in fla-grante delicto cases appeared to be chaotic. Applying the compulsory measures in flagrante delicto cases at the early investigation stage are both realistic and theoretically legitimate. It should set up an independent procedure for flagrante delicto cases and at the same time modify the detention system. In doing so, the identity of the flagrante delicto suspects summoned by the oral or un-documented in the detention would be clear. It would also help to address the legality of the interrogation transcripts followed by questioning and eliminating the phenomenon of “investigation first after filing a case.”