法治时代的解释主义之争——以陈金钊与范进学之间有关法律解释问题的争论为分析对象

A Debate about Legal Interpretation in the Era of the Rule of Law

发生在陈金钊和范进学之间有关法律解释问题的争论,扩及到对诸多相关法律理论问题上的争论。双方秉持各自"反对解释"抑或"如何解释"的立场,从对"法治反对解释"命题的"真/假"之争不断地上升到对相关法律解释学的学科属性之争、司法观之争、法律观之争以及法治观之争等。无论是主张守法主义的法律意识形态,还是主张能动主义的法律意识形态,实际上,法治时代同时需要这两种不同的声音。

The debate about legal interpretation between Chen Jin - zhao and Fan Jin - xue involves so many divergences in legal theory. Both insist on themselves＇“resisting interpretation” or“how to interpret”, the queries arise from the “true or false” to the topic of“ Rule of Law Resisting Interpretation”, to the nature of legal interpretation, the view of law, the nature of justice and the view of Rule of Law. In fact, between the Legalism and the Activism, the era of Rule of Law needs both.