《民事诉讼法》修改与不予执行仲裁裁决——以北京仲裁委员会为对象的实证分析

On the Non-Enforcement of Arbitral Award with Background ofRevising Civil Procedural Law: An Empirical Analysis inPractice Related to Beijing Arbitration Commission

目前学界和仲裁界对《民事诉讼法》第213条规定的不予执行仲裁裁决的条件是否修改及怎样修改存在较大争议。为了给相关讨论提供有益素材,有必要取得来自仲裁及司法实践的第一手资料并作实证性的考察。通过对北京仲裁委员会1995-2010年仲裁裁决被不予执行的裁定进行分析发现,影响不予执行的因素是多元的。从实务的视角出发,至少应把第213条第(四)款牵涉事实认定的事由统一到《仲裁法》第58条作为撤销仲裁裁决事由的"伪造或隐瞒证据"的规定上去。

There is much debate currently on how to revise the grounds for non - enforcing arbitral award stipu-lated in article 213 of China civil procedural law. To provide beneficial reference for related discussion, it is necessary to do an empirical analysis of the first - hand data from the arbitration and judicial practice. Study on rulings concerned with the non - enforcement of the awards issued by Beijing Arbitration Commission from 1995 to 2010 ex- presses that factors illustrating the non - enforcement of an award are diverse. From the perspective of practice, at least the ground related to fact finding stipulated in Article 213 （4） should be changed into ＂falsifying or eoncealing evidence＂ which is stipulated as grounds of setting aside award in Article 58 of China arbitration law.