期刊文献+

SF-36量表应用于居民自我健康测评的信度和效度研究 被引量:81

A study of the reliability and validity of SF-36 scale on evaluating health of population
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价SF-36量表用于测量上海市居民健康及生存质量的信度和效度。方法:采用SF-36生存质量量表,由经过统一培训的调查员对上海市15岁以上居民2016人进行面对面访谈,对测量结果进行信度和效度分析。信度包括内部信度和分半信度,效度包括准则效度和结构效度。采用相关分析、非参数检验、多重比较和因子分析方法对SF-36量表的信度和效度进行评价。结果:整个量表的Cronbach’α系数以及去掉一项内容后得到的Cronbach’α系数均高于0.8,总量表的分半信度和各个分量表的分半信度均高于0.6。反映量表的信度较好。在准则效度的评价中,实际结果和理论推断和以往研究结果相一致,表明量表的准则效度较好。因子分析所产生的3个公共因子可解释总变异的75.30%,并在相应项目上有较强的因子负荷,表明量表的结构效度较好。结论:SF-36量表具有较好的信度和效度,适用于上海市居民的生存质量评价。 Objective: To test the validity and reliability of "the Short-Form 36 Health Survey Scale (SF-36)", which were used to evaluate health of population in Shanghai. Methods: A total of 2 016 people above 15 years old were inter- viewed face-to-face with SF-36 by trained investigators. The validity and reliability were analyzed. Reliability included split- half reliability and internal consistency. Validity included criterion validity and structure validity. 3~ne reliability and validity of SF-36 were evaluated with correlation analysis, non-parameter test, multiple comparison of mean and factor analysis. Results: All the internal consistency coefficients were above O. 8. All the split-half reliability coefficients were above O. 6. Those proved SF-36 had preferable reliability. The actual results were consistent with theoretical inference and previous study results, proving the SF-36 had preferable discriminatory validity, Three common factors were extracted by factor analysis, which accounted for 75.30% of total variance and the factor loads of three common factors were relatively powerful in related items. So the SF-36 had satisfactory structure validity. Conclusion: Tne Short-Form 36 Health Survey Scale (SF-36) has good reliability and validi- ty ,which is available for the evaluation of quality of lives among Shanghai population.
出处 《中国卫生资源》 2012年第3期265-267,共3页 Chinese Health Resources
关键词 SF-36量表 生存质量 信度 效度 The Short Form 36 Health Survey Scale Quality of lives Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献21

  • 1卢文岱.SAS/PC统计分析软件实用技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1996..
  • 2王鹏.神经性厌食症10例临床分析[J].中华精神科杂志,1999,32(1).
  • 3卢文岱,SAS/PC统计分析软件实用技术,1996年
  • 4Ware JE Jr. SF-36 Health Survey. Mannual and Interpretation Guild[M].Boston. MA:The Health Institute, New England Center,1993.
  • 5Gandek B,Ware JE Jr,Aaronson NK,et al. Tests of data quality,scaling assumptions,and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries:results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment[J].J Clin Epidemiol,1998,51(11):1149-1158.
  • 6Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M,Gandek B,et al.The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countires:results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment [J].J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51 ( 11 ): 1159- 1165.
  • 7Bailey K D. Methods of Social Research (4th edition)[M]. New York:The Free Press,1994.115-165.
  • 8Bartko J J.The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability[J]. Psychol Rep,1996,(19):3-6.
  • 9Cohen J.Factor-Analytical Based Rationle for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence.Scale.J consul.Clini.Psychology,1957,2l:451-457
  • 10Silverstein AS.Factor Structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale.Revised.J.Consul.Clini.Psychology,1982,50:66l-664

共引文献693

同被引文献790

引证文献81

二级引证文献943

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部