期刊文献+

F1000:新兴医学论文评价和检索系统 被引量:7

F1000:a New Medical Literature Evaluation and Retrieval System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对F1000这种新兴医学论文评价和检索网络系统进行了较为简要的介绍和分析,并对该系统中少有的中医药文献进行了简要分析,以期通过介绍和分析,促进我国中医药,甚或是医药行业同仁对该系统的关注,为提升医药行业论文发表的质量提供重要信息。目前国内外学术界已公认F1000是一个极其有用的文献评价工具,可帮助医生和研究者快捷地掌握自己学科领域的最新研究进展。 This article introduced a new clinical research evaluating system, Faculty of 1000 Medicine ( F1000M), in which articles are selected, rated, and evaluated by its faculty of over 10 000 expert scientists and clinical researchers engaging in more than 3 000 peer-reviewed journals. It is a kind of post-publication peer re- view. A few evaluated articles about Chinese medicine were selected and introduced. It is hoped that F1000 could inspire both traditional Chinese medicine researchers and Western medicine researchers to conduct good quality research and write good clinical research reports.
作者 廖星 谢雁鸣
出处 《中国中西医结合杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期701-703,共3页 Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
基金 科技部"重大新药创制"科技重大专项(No.2009ZX09502-030)
关键词 F1000 医学文献 评价 检索 F1000 medical literature evaluating retrieval
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Lolle SJ,Victor JL,Young JM,et al.Genome-wide non-Mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic information in Ara-bidopsis[J].Nature,2005,434(7032):505-509.
  • 2Zhang XW,Yan XJ,Zhou ZR,et al.Arsenic trioxide con-trols the fate of the PML-RARalpha oncoprotein by directly binding PML[J].Science,2010,328(5975):240-243.
  • 3http://f1000.com/search/evaluations?query=Traditional+Chinese+Medicine&sortBy=f1000Factor&page=2.

同被引文献57

  • 1何钦成,王孝宁,韩大勇,郭继军.TOPSIS法在科技人员业绩评价中的应用[J].科研管理,2004,25(4):16-22. 被引量:18
  • 2郭丽芳.评价论文学术质量的文献计量学指标探讨[J].现代情报,2005,25(3):11-12. 被引量:66
  • 3万锦堃,花平寰,孙秀坤.期刊论文被引用及其Web全文下载的文献计量分析[J].现代图书情报技术,2005(4):58-62. 被引量:82
  • 4龙莎,葛新权.科技论文学术水平评估[J].科技与管理,2007,9(1):133-135. 被引量:16
  • 5Garfield E. Citation Indexes for Science: a New Dimension in Doc-umentation through Association of Ideas [ J ]. Science, 1955,122(3159) :108-111.
  • 6Garfield E. Using the Impact Factor[ EB/OL] . [2013-01-19] .ht-tp:// researchanalytics. thcxnsraireiutas. cwn/ essays/usinguipactfactor/.
  • 7Hirsch J E. An index to Quantify an Individual's Scientific Re-search Output [ J ]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005,102 ( 46):16569-16572.
  • 8夏武青,葛芬,唐辉.医学F1000推荐文献的来源期刊分布[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2011,20(11) :59-62.
  • 9Reinstein A, Hasselback J R, Riley M E, et al. Pitfalls of using citation indices for making academic accounting promotion, tenure, teaching load, and merit pay decisions [J]. Issues in Accounting Education, 2011,26( 1 ) :99 - 131.
  • 10Psmeyers P, Burbules N C. How to improve your impact factor : Questioning the quantification of academic quality [ J ]. J Philos Educ, 2011,45(1) :1 - 17.

引证文献7

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部