期刊文献+

Active surveillance as a practical strategy to differentiate lethal and non-lethal prostate cancer subtypes 被引量:2

积极监测是区分致死性与非致死性前列腺癌亚型的可行方法
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Differentiation between lethal and non-lethal prostate cancer subtypes has become a very important issue in avoiding excessive treatment in an era when prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has reduced the rate of prostate cancer deaths by more than 20%. However, it is difficult to determine the patients who may or may not benefit from immediate treatment interventions at the time of the initial diagnosis. The selection of candidate patients who can postpone immediate treatment and undergo follow-ups with a specific surveillance program, or 'active surveillance,' is a practical way to minimize overtreatment. In this review, the benefits and risks of active surveillance are discussed. Future perspectives, including imaging and new biomarkers for improving the outcomes of active surveillance programs, are also discussed. 如何区分致死性与非致死性前列腺癌亚型在预防前列腺癌过度治疗方面已经成为一个非常重要的课题,尤其在这个用前列腺特异性抗原筛查可使前列腺癌的死亡率下降大于20%的时代。然而,判断初次诊断的患者是否会受益于立即干预治疗是非常困难的。以某种监测项目来随访看起来不需要立即治疗的患者,即所谓的“积极监测”,是弥补过度治疗的一种可行的方法。本综述讨论了积极监测的利弊,对提高积极监测结果的影像和新的生物标记的未来前景也进行了展望。
机构地区 Department of Urology
出处 《Asian Journal of Andrology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第3期361-364,I0004,共5页 亚洲男性学杂志(英文版)
关键词 active surveillance diagnosis low risk prostate cancer 前列腺癌 诊断 低风险 积极监测
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90.
  • 2Ito Y, loka A, Tanaka M, Nakayama T, Tsukuma H. Trends in cancer incidence and mortality in Osaka, Japan: evaluation of cancer control activities. Cancer Sci 2009; 100: 2390-5.
  • 3Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley 0, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer JClin2011; 61: 212-36.
  • 4Pearson JD, Carter HB. Natural history of changes in prostate specific antigen in early stage prostate cancer. J Urol1994; 152: 1743-8.
  • 5Schroeder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med2009; 360: 1320-8.
  • 6Roobol MJ, Kerkhof M, Schroder FH, Cuzick J, Sasieni P et al. Prostate cancer mortality reduction by prostate-specific antigen-based screening adjusted for nonattendance and contamination in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Eur Urol2009; 56: 584-91.
  • 7Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL3rd, Buys SS, Chia D et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 1310-9.
  • 8Loeb S, Vonesh EF, Metter EJ, Carter HB, Gann PH et al. What is the true number needed to screen and treat to save a life with prostate-specific antigen testing? J Clin OncoI2011; 29: 464-7.
  • 9Cooperberg MR, BroeringJM, Kantoff PW, Carroll PRo Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol2007; 178 (3 Pt 2): s14-9.
  • 10Anandadas CN, Clarke NW, Davidson SE, O'Reilly PH, Logue JP et al. Early prostate cancer-which treatment do men prefer and why? BJU Int 2010; 107: 1762-8.

同被引文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部