期刊文献+

Macroscopically-Zoned Grandite from the Garnetite Skarn of Meka Presedla(Kopaonik Mountain,Serbia) 被引量:1

Macroscopically-Zoned Grandite from the Garnetite Skarn of Meka Presedla(Kopaonik Mountain,Serbia)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The macroscopically-zoned grandite from the garnetite skarn of Meka Presedla (Kopaonik Mountain, Serbia) was studied with optical microscopy, electron microprobe analysis (EMPA), Fourier transform infra-red (FT-IR), and Raman methods. The EMPA results indicate that the main core-rim compositional variations (Ca2.93-2.97Mn0.05-0.06Mg0.00-0.01AI1.14-L26 Fe0.72-0.83 Ti0.00-0.02Si2.97-3.02012) slightly differ along the zones, showing evidence for a quasi-cyclic alternation of the oscillatory zoning nature. Among this, considerable variation is observed only by the AI-Fe3+ substitutions in the octahedral site. The EMPA also indicate that the grandite zones compositionally vary, mostly within +1 and ±2 mol% of the homogeneity level range, that is, Grs64±1Adra36±1SpS2 (A), Grs62±1Adra38±1Sps2 (B), Grs59±2Adr40±2Sps2 (C), Grs58±2Adr41±2Sps2 (D), and Grss±1Adr41±1Sps2 (E). Therefore, the investigated garnet can be considered as relatively highly homogeneous. The majority of compositions lie within the narrow miscibility region of 0.58±2〈XGrs〈0.64±1, without gaps, and with only three outliers near the zone boundaries of approximately 0.38〈XGrs〈0.52. FT-IR and Raman bands are almost constant within the zones and adequate to the chemical compositions. All of the zones should be considered as anhydrous. From the results, formation temperatures between -600 and 720℃ and pressures 0f-2-3 kbars, are derived. Among five possible causes for the slightly optical anisotropy of grandite, three were reconsidered, and consequently rejected. The macroscopically-zoned grandite from the garnetite skarn of Meka Presedla (Kopaonik Mountain, Serbia) was studied with optical microscopy, electron microprobe analysis (EMPA), Fourier transform infra-red (FT-IR), and Raman methods. The EMPA results indicate that the main core-rim compositional variations (Ca2.93-2.97Mn0.05-0.06Mg0.00-0.01AI1.14-L26 Fe0.72-0.83 Ti0.00-0.02Si2.97-3.02012) slightly differ along the zones, showing evidence for a quasi-cyclic alternation of the oscillatory zoning nature. Among this, considerable variation is observed only by the AI-Fe3+ substitutions in the octahedral site. The EMPA also indicate that the grandite zones compositionally vary, mostly within +1 and ±2 mol% of the homogeneity level range, that is, Grs64±1Adra36±1SpS2 (A), Grs62±1Adra38±1Sps2 (B), Grs59±2Adr40±2Sps2 (C), Grs58±2Adr41±2Sps2 (D), and Grss±1Adr41±1Sps2 (E). Therefore, the investigated garnet can be considered as relatively highly homogeneous. The majority of compositions lie within the narrow miscibility region of 0.58±2〈XGrs〈0.64±1, without gaps, and with only three outliers near the zone boundaries of approximately 0.38〈XGrs〈0.52. FT-IR and Raman bands are almost constant within the zones and adequate to the chemical compositions. All of the zones should be considered as anhydrous. From the results, formation temperatures between -600 and 720℃ and pressures 0f-2-3 kbars, are derived. Among five possible causes for the slightly optical anisotropy of grandite, three were reconsidered, and consequently rejected.
出处 《Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition)》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第2期393-406,共14页 地质学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the Serbian Ministry of Science and Environmental Protection (projectno. 1992 and 142055)
关键词 grandite ANISOTROPY compositional variation zone homogeneities miscibility region grandite, anisotropy, compositional variation, zone homogeneities, miscibility region
  • 相关文献

参考文献61

  • 1Aines,R.D.,and Rossman,G.R.,1984. The hydrous componenin garnets: Pyralspites. American Mineralogist,69: 1116-1126.
  • 2Akizuki,M.,1984. Origin of optical variations in grossular-andradite garnet. American Mineralogist,69: 328-338.
  • 3Akizuki,M.,1989. Growth structure and crystal symmetry ofgrossular garnets from the Jeffrey Mine,Asbestos,QuebecCanada. American Mineralogist,74: 859-864.
  • 4Aleksi,V.,Kaleni,M.,and Kemenci,R.,1987. Geology ofSerbia-Metamorphism III-2. Institute for the Regional geologyand Paleontology of Faculty of Mining and Geology,pp. 282,Belgrade (in Serbian with English summary).
  • 5Allen,F.M.,and Buseck,P.R.,1988. XRD,FTIR and TEMstudies of optically anisotropic grossular garnets. AmericanMineralogist,73: 568-584.
  • 6Amthauer,G.,and Rossman,G.R.,1998. The hydrouscomponent in andradite garnet. American Mineralogist,83:835-840.
  • 7Andrut,M.,and Wildner,M.,2001. The crystal chemistry ofbirefringent natural uvarovites: Part I. Optical investigationsand UV-VIS-IR absorption spectroscopy. AmericanMineralogist,86: 1219-1230.
  • 8Andrut,M.,and Wildner,M.,2002. The crystal chemistry ofbirefringent natural uvarovites. Part III. Application of thesuperposition model of crystal fields with a characterization ofsynthetic cubic uvarovite. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals,29: 595-608.
  • 9Andrut,M.,Wildner,M.,and Beran,A.,2002. The crystalchemistry of birefringent natural uvarovites. Part IV. OHdefect incorporation mechanisms in non-cubic garnets derivedfrom polarized IR spectroscopy. European Journal ofMineralogy,14: 1019-1026.
  • 10Blanc,Y.,and Maisonneuve,J.,1973. Sur la biréfringence desgrenats calciques. Bulletin de la Société fran aise deMinéralogie et de Cristallographie,96: 320-321.

同被引文献215

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部