微创锥孔与常规钻孔引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿对比分析

目的 对比分析微创锥孔引流与常规钻孔引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的临床疗效。方法 选择45例慢性硬膜下血肿病人,分为微创组和常规组,微创组CT定位用YL-1型血肿粉碎针微创锥孔引流,常规组常规钻孔引流治,治疗后,分别进行疗效评估。结果 微创组和常规组疗效两组比较无显著性差异(>0.05),并发症两组比较有显著性差异(<0.01)。结论 两方法达到相同临床疗效。但微创锥孔引流简便,并发症少,痛苦少。

Objective Comparison of minimally invasive taper hole drainage and conventional treatment of chronic subdural hematoma by trepanation and clinical effects. Methods Select 45 cases of chronic subdural hematoma patients, divided into Group of minimally invasive and conventional groups, group of minimally invasive CT locating YL-1 minimally invasive hematoma smash needle taper hole of drainage, General set of drill-hole drainage treatment, after treatment, separate evaluation of the effect. Results Group of minimally invasive and conventional groups, the curative effect comparison of two sets of no significant difference （P〉0.05）, complications of two sets of comparison there are significant differences （P〈0.01）. Conclusion Two methods have the same clinical effect. But minimally invasive taper hole drainage easier, fewer complications, less painful.