期刊文献+

微创技术置入PHILOS钢板治疗肱骨干近端骨折 被引量:6

Application of minimally invasive PHILOS in treatment of proximal humeral fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价微创接骨板固定(MIPO)技术置入PHILOS(proximal humeral internal locking system)治疗肱骨干近端骨折的临床效果。方法自2008年11月-2009年8月,采用MIPO技术置入PHILOS钢板治疗23例肱骨干近端移位骨折。结果本组获随访6~17个月,平均11.3个月。X线片示22例于术后6个月内骨折达骨性愈合;1例因内固定松动发生延迟愈合,但无临床症状,于术后9个月骨折愈合,功能恢复至可。术后半年1例发生肩关节撞击征,取出内固定行功能锻炼后功能恢复至可。采用Constant—Murley评分方法评定疗效:优11例,良10例,可2例,优良率91.3%。结论采用MIPO技术置入PHILOS钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折是一种良好的方法.减少骨不连发生率.有利于肩关节早期功能恢复。 Objective To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of MIPO (minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis) with PHILOS (proximal humeral internal locking system) in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fracture. Methods From Nov. 2008 to Aug. 2009, 23 patients with displaced fractures of the proximal humeral shaft were recruited. Results All patients were followed up for 6-17 months, with an average of 11.3 months. Radiological examination revealed bony union within 6 months in 22 cases. There's one case delayed union, which remained a asymptomatic and eventually healed at 9 months postoperative with acceptable Constant-Murley score and there's other one case of shoulder impingement diagnosed at 6 months postoperative. After implant removal, they all achieved an acceptable Constant-Murley score. According to Constant- Murley scoring system, there were 11 excellent, 10 good and 2 acceptable results, the excellent and good rate was 91.3%. Conclusion MIPO technique using PHILOS is an effective method to treat proximal humeral shaft fractures, which reduces rate of bone nonunion and facilitates functional recovery of the shoulder joint. During the surgery, it is important to achieve good fracture reduction and avoid complications.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2012年第5期399-401,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
关键词 微创接骨板固定技术 锁定加压接骨板 肱骨干近端骨折 内固定 MIPO (Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique) PHILOS (proximal humeral internal locking system) Proximal humeral fracture Internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1赖爱宁,黄飞,沈彦,陈才平,孙军健,魏雅莉.肩关节脱位合并肱骨近端隐匿性骨折15例诊治体会[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(1):86-87. 被引量:4
  • 2Ajmal M, O'Sullivaa M, McCabe J, et al. Antegrade locked in- tramedullary nailing in humeral shaft fractures [J]. Injury, 2001, 32 (9): 692-694.
  • 3Petsatodes G, Karataglis D, Papadopoulos P, et al. Antegrade inter- locking nailing of humeral shaft fractures [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2004, 9 (3): 247-252.
  • 4Apivatthakakul T, Arpomchayanon O, Bavornratanavech S. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the humeral shaft fracture. Is it possible? A cadavefic study and preliminary report [J]. Injury, 2005, 36(4): 530-538.
  • 5Gardner M J, Griffith MH, Lorich DG. Helical plating of the proximalhumerus[J]. Injury, 2005, 36: 1197-1200.
  • 6Foster R J, Dixon GL, Bach AW, et al. Internal fixation of fractures and non-unions of the humeral shaft: indications and results in a multi-center study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1985, 67: 857-864.
  • 7Chao TC, Chou WY, Chung JC, eta/. Humeral shaft fractures treated by dynamic compression plates, ender nails and interlocking nails[J]. Int Orthop, 2005, 29(2): 88-91.
  • 8Hunter SG. The closed treatment of fractures of the humeral shaft[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1982, 164: 192-198.
  • 9O'Driscoll SW. Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2005, 14: 186-194.
  • 10向明,陈杭,谢杰,杨顺,唐浩琛,杨国勇.MIPO技术治疗肱骨干骨折的临床研究及中期疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(5):417-419. 被引量:14

二级参考文献22

  • 1王刚.肱骨外科颈骨折伴肩关节脱位[J].临床误诊误治,2004,17(9):660-661. 被引量:11
  • 2Yian EH,Ramapa AJ,Arneberg O,et al.The Constant sore in normal shoulders..[ Shoulder Elbow Surg,2005,14(2);128-133.
  • 3Mckoy BE,Bensen CU,Hartsock LA.Fractures about the shoulder: conservative management.Orhtop Clin North Am,2000,31 (2):205-216.
  • 4Agudelo J,Schurmann M,Stahel P,et al.Aualysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates.J Orthop Trauma,2007,21 ( 10):676-681.
  • 5Gardner MJ,Weil Y,Barker JU,et al.The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.J Orthop Trauma, 2007,21(3):185-191.
  • 6Jinn Lin.Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with humeral locked nail and comparison with plate fixation.J Trauma, 1998,44:859-864.
  • 7Farragos AF,Schemitsch EH,Mckee MD.Complications of intramedullary nailing for fracture of the humeral shaft:a review.J Orthop Trauma, 1999,13(4) :258-67.
  • 8Muller ME,Nazarian S, Koch P, et al.The comprehensive classification of fracture of long bones.Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1990,54- 85.
  • 9Gustilo RB,Anderson JT.Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones.J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1976,58:453.
  • 10Constant CR, Murley AH.A clinical method of functional assessmemt of the shoulder.Clin Orthop, 1987,214 : 160.

共引文献33

同被引文献35

  • 1陈学明,韩有全,周忠.应用三叶板和骨诱导活性材料治疗肱骨近端粉碎性骨折[J].创伤外科杂志,2006,8(3):218-219. 被引量:5
  • 2Hirschmann MT,Fallegger B,Amsler F,et al. Clinical longer-term results after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures with a locking compression plate(PHILOS)[J]. J Orthop Trauma,2011,25(5): 286-293.
  • 3Kilic B, Uysal M, Cinar BM, et al. Early resuhs of treatment of proxi- mal humerus fractures with the PHILOS locking plate[J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2008,42(3):149-153.
  • 4Roderer G,Erhardt J ,Graf M ,et al. Clinical results for minimally in- vasive locked plating of proximal humerus fractures [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010,24(7):400-406.
  • 5Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures.Patti:Classification and evaluation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1970,52:1077.
  • 6Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: part I Classifi- cation and evaluation[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res ,2006,44(2): 77-82.
  • 7Constant CR,Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assess- ment of the shoulder[J]. Clin Orthop Rela Res, 1987,214: 160-164.
  • 8Burton DJ,Wells G,Watters A,et 81. Early experience with the PlantTan Fixator Plate foe 2 and 3 part fractures of proximal humerus[J]. Injury ,2005,36:1190-1196.
  • 9Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fratures. Part L Classificationand evaluation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) ,1970,52(6):1077-1089.
  • 10Farouk 0,Krettek C?Miclau T,et al. Minimally invasive plate os-teosynthesis: Does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply-less than the traditional technique [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2000,14(3):225.

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部