期刊文献+

中国与G-7的双边服务贸易成本的测度与决定因素——基于改进引力模型的应用 被引量:10

The Measurement and Determinant of the Bilateral Service Trade Costs between China and G-7——Based on Revised Gravity Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对中国双边服务贸易成本的测度和对其决定因素的探寻可以更好地为服务贸易流动提供解释,对中国服务贸易开放有重要的政策启示。笔者基于改进的引力模型,测度了1999年~2007年间中国与G-7的双边服务贸易成本,并利用面板数据对其进行分解,以此寻求影响中国对外服务贸易成本的因素。结果表明:中国与G-7的双边服务贸易成本总体呈下降趋势,并且在加入WTO后有加速的迹象;空间距离与服务贸易壁垒是双边服务贸易成本存在的主因,与贸易国的人均收入之差及共同的海陆边界有助于降低双边服务贸易成本,共同的贸易集团对于两国服务贸易成本的影响并不明显。 The measurement and determinants of China's bilateral service trade cost can be better explained for the service trade flow,which has important policy implications for China's service trade opening.With the revised gravity model,this paper measures the bilateral service trade cost between China and G-7 countries during 1999~2007 by analyzing the panel data to seek the influence factors of China's Foreign Service trade cost.It is shown that the bilateral service trade cost between China and G-7 is decreasing with a signs of acceleration of such decreasing after China's join in the WTO;Space distance and service trade barriers are the main cause of bilateral service trade cost.Per capita income difference and common land and sea borders contributes to reduce the bilateral service trade cost whereas the impact of common trade group on the service trade cost is not obvious.
作者 马凌远
出处 《经济经纬》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期70-74,共5页 Economic Survey
基金 河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2011FJJ044) 河南省软科学研究计划项目(112400450207)
关键词 服务贸易 贸易成本 决定因素 Novy模型 Service Trade Trade Cost Determinants Novy model
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1ANDERSON J , VAN WINCOOP E. 2003. Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle [ J]. American Economic Rview, 93 : 170 - 192.
  • 2CAIRNCROSS F. 2001. The death of distance: 2.0 how the communications revolution will change our lives [ M ]. London: Texere.
  • 3DISDIER A , KEITH H. 2004. The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade. Processed [ M ]. University of British Columbia.
  • 4HANSON H. 2005. Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration [ J ]. Journal of Interna- tional Economics, 20 : 180 - 191.
  • 5MIROUDOT S, SAUVAGE J, SHEPHERD B. 2010. Meas- uring the cost of international trade in services [ Z ]. MPRA Paper No. 27655, posted 22.
  • 6NOVY D. 2006. Is the iceberg melting less quickly? Inter- national trade costs after World War II [ Z ]. Working Paper, Mimeo, University of Warwick.
  • 7NOVY D. 2007, Gravity redux: measuring international trade costs with panel data[ Z]. Working Paper Mimeo, University of Warwick.
  • 8OBSTFELD M , ROGOFF K. 2000. The six major puzzles in international macroeconomics., is there a common cause? [ C]// Ben S. Bernanke and Kenneth Rogoff (eds.) , NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge, MIT Press.

同被引文献81

  • 1李建萍.贸易自由化的福利研究新进展[J].经济学动态,2021(1):143-158. 被引量:5
  • 2潘镇.制度质量、制度距离与双边贸易[J].中国工业经济,2006(7):45-52. 被引量:104
  • 3Anderson J.E.,Wincoop,V.E.Gravity with Gravitas:a Solution to the Border Puzzle[J],American Economic Review,2003(93):170-192.
  • 4Anderson J.E.,Wincoop,V.E.Trade Costs[J].Journal of Economic Literature,2004(42):691-752.
  • 5Chen N.,Novy D.Gravity,Trade Integration and Heterogeneity across Industries[J].Journal of International Economics,2011(85):206-221.
  • 6Deard A.V.,Stern R.M.Measurement of Non-tariff Barriers[R].OECD Economics Department Working Paper,No.179,1997.
  • 7Duval Y.,Utoktham C.Intraregional Trade Costs in Asia[R].ESCAP Staff Working Paper,2011.
  • 8Eaton J.,Kortum S.Technology,Geography and Trade[J].Econometrica,2002(70):1741-1779.
  • 9Hoekman B.Tentative First Steps:an Assessment of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Services[R].CEPR Discussion Papers 1150,1995.
  • 10Mc Callum J.National Borders Matter:Canada-U.S.Regional Trade Patterns[J].American Economic Review,1995(85):615-623.

引证文献10

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部