期刊文献+

基于CCSD多属性评价方法的区域经济竞争力研究 被引量:7

Study of Regional Economic Competitiveness Based on Correlation Coefficients Standard Deviation Model for MultipleAttribute Evaluation Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对于主成分分析方法在区域竞争力研究中所表现出的局限性与不足,本文采用了一种基于相关系数标准差(CCSD)的多属性评价方法。该方法综合考虑了指标属性值的相关程度和偏差大小对评价结果的影响,并通过构建CCSD模型将其影响反映到指标权重的确定上,从而能够有效地克服主成分分析方法和传统的多属性评价方法在评价实施过程中属性权重确定的主观性。CCSD多属性评价方法在指标权重确定中消除了指标间的相关性影响,因此在指标选择上不再受统计量的局限,从而能够通过指标数据确定指标权重,依据客观数据得到评价结果。本文应用该方法对我国31个省市自治区的经济竞争力进行了对比研究,发现其评价结果与实际经济发展现状相一致,从而证实了该方法的有效性和实用性。 Addressing the defect and limitations of principal component analysis method used for regional competitiveness research,this paper uses a correlation coefficient standard deviation model for multi-attribute evaluation method.The method takes into account the impacts of the correlation and deviation of corresponding index attribute values on the evaluation results,and reflects them in the determination of weights.The CCSD method eliminates the correlation of index to determine the index weights,so the index selection no longer subjects to the limitations of statistics.The index data are used to get the objective weights and evaluation results.On evaluating the economic competitiveness of 31 provinces in China,the evaluation results show consistency with the status quo of the actual economic development,which indicate the method is effective and practical.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期249-255,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70801022)
关键词 运筹学 多属性评价 CCSD模型 区域竞争力 主成分分析 operations research multiple attribute evaluation CCSD model regional competitiveness principal component analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Budd L, Hirmis A. Conceptual framework for regional competitiveness[J]. Regional Studies, 2004, 38(9) : 1015-1028.
  • 2Kitson M, Martin R, Tyler P. Regional competitiveness : an elusive yet key concept [ J ]. Regional Studies, 2004, 38 (9) : 991-999.
  • 3Porter M E. Building the microeconomic foundations of prosperity: findings from the business competitiveness index [ R ]. World Competitiveness Report, 2004.
  • 4Huggins R. Creating a UK competitiveness index: regional and local benchmarking[J]. Regional Studies, 2003, 37( 1): 89-96.
  • 5王岚,赵国杰.基于ANP的地区文化产业竞争力评价模型与指标体系[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(7):129-132. 被引量:50
  • 6迟国泰,王钰娟,刘艳萍.基于三角模糊熵的经济评价模型及副省级城市的实证研究[J].运筹与管理,2010,19(5):107-117. 被引量:29
  • 7Hu S H, Zuo J H. Applications of factor analysis to evaluation of comprehensive competitiveness of regional economy[ C].// Inernational Conference on Innovation & Management.
  • 8Barron F H, Barrett B E. Decision quality using ranked attribute weights[ J]. Management Science, 1996, 42( 11 ) : 1515-1523.
  • 9Ma J, Fan Z P, Huang L H. A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 112 (2) : 397- 404.
  • 10Altuzarra A, Moreno J, Nez J M, Salvador M. Consensus building in AHP-group decision making: a bayesian approach[ J]. Operations Research, 2010, 58 (6) : 1755-1773.

二级参考文献46

共引文献243

同被引文献47

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部