期刊文献+

GSS椎弓根螺钉内固定并二期伤椎骨水泥灌注治疗胸腰椎骨折 被引量:4

GSS pedicle screw fixation combined with two-stage bone cement perfusion for thoracolumbar fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨GSS椎弓根螺钉内固定结合二期伤椎骨水泥灌注治疗胸腰椎骨折的有效性和安全性。方法2005年3月~2010年10月共31例胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者行后路GSS椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗,术后3~18个月根据X线及CT复查情况,出现"蛋壳现象"的患者在取出内固定前行伤椎骨水泥灌注,记录术前、术后及末次随访时的伤椎高度及X线片测量的Cobb角角度。结果本组患者均未出现骨水泥渗漏,术后12~18个月取出内固定后再随访1~3年。术后伤椎椎体高度及Cobb角与术前相比有明显改善。结论 GSS椎弓根螺钉内固定结合二期伤椎骨水泥灌注治疗胸腰椎骨折可达到良好的治疗效果,可作为治疗胸腰椎骨折的新的尝试。 Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures by GSS pedicle screw fixation combined with two-stage bone cement perfusion.Methods From March 2005 to October 2010,31 patients with thoracolumbar bursting fractures were treated with posterior GSS pedicle screw fixation.The patients were reviewed by X-ray and CT scan 3-18 months postoperatively.Once "eggshell phenomenon" appeared,bone cement was used in the injured vertebral body before removing the fixators.Injured vertebral height and Cobb's angle were measured preoperatively,postoperatively and at the final follow-up.Results No leakage of bone cement happened in all the patients.The internal fixators were removed 12-18 months postoperatively.Then the patients were followed up for 1-3 years.Fractured vertebral height and Cobb's angle were significantly improved after surgery.Conclusion GSS combined with two-stage bone cement perfusion for thoracolumbar fractures can achieve a good therapeutic effect.It can be taken as an attempt at the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2012年第2期76-78,共3页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 胸椎 腰椎 脊柱骨折 内固定器 骨黏合剂 Thoracic vertebrae Lumbar vertebrae Spinal fractures Internal fixators Bone cements
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献13

共引文献325

同被引文献37

  • 1陈跃平,朱勇,刘汝专.磷酸钙骨水泥加固颈椎前路单皮质骨螺钉的生物力学研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(9):674-676. 被引量:2
  • 2Leung F,Blauth M,Bavonratanavech S.Surgery for fragility hip fracture-streamlining the process [J]. Osteoporo$ Int, 2010, 2 1 (Suppl 4): 519-521.
  • 3Park JI, Cho DC, Kim KT, et al. Anterior cervical diseectomy and fusion using a stand-alone polyetheretherketone cage packed with local autobone: assessment of bone fusion and subsidence [J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2013, 54(3) :189-193.
  • 4Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker E, et al. The NEtherlands Cervical Kinematics (NECK) trial. Cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with or without interbody fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation; a double- blind randomised multicenter study [ J ]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2010, 11:122.
  • 5Kiner DW, Wybo CD, Sterba W, et al. Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diameter screws versus cement augmentation[ J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(24):2618-2622.
  • 6Liu D, Zhang Y, Zhang B, et al. Comparison of expansive pedicle screw and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw in osteoporotic sheep lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical and interfacial evaluations [J]. PLoS One. 2013. 8 (9) : e74827.
  • 7Burval D J, McLain RF, Milks R, et al. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength[ J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , 2007, 32 (10) : 1077-1083.
  • 8Wall S J, Soin SP, Knight TA, et al. Mechanical evaluation of a 4-ram cancellous "rescue" screw in osteoporotic cortical bone: a cadaveric study[ J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010, 24(6) :379-382.
  • 9Patel PS, Shepherd DE, Hukins DW. The effect of screw insertion angle and thread type on the pullout strength of bone screws in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models [ J ]. Med Eng Phys, 2010, 32(8):822-828.
  • 10Ren C, Song Y, Xue Y, et al. Mid-to long-term outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior diseectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23 ( 5 ) : 1115-1123.

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部