期刊文献+

基于MGR模型修正我国大陆中强以上地震的震级-频度关系和确定震级极限值 被引量:4

Modification of magnitude-frequency relation and magnitude limit determination based on MGR model for moderate-strong earthquakes in Chinese mainland
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从理论上推导了修正的古登堡-里克特模型的震级上限的确定方法,应用常用的两种模型对我国分区域进行了震级-频度关系的修正和震级极限值的确定.结果表明,我国大陆存在非线性的震级-频度关系,传统的NGR模型不能反映非线性的震级-频度关系,而MGR模型能反映适合非线性和线性的震级-频度关系,因此MGR模型适合我国各研究区中强以上地震的震级-频度关系.当震级-频度关系为非线性时,用MGR模型确定的震级极限值较准确. In this paper the method of determining upper magnitude limit following modified Gutenberg-Richter model is derived.Based on two commonly used models the modified magnitude-frequency relations and upper magnitude limits for various regions of Chinese mainland are determined.The result shows that there are nonlinear magnitude-frequency relations for earthquakes in Chinese mainland and the traditional normal G-R model can not reflect nonlinear feature of actual magnitude-frequency relations.While MGR model is suitable for expressing both linear and nonlinear magnitude-frequency relations,and is more suitable for dealing with moderate-strong earthquakes in various regions of Chinese mainland.When the magnitude-frequency relation is nonlinear,the upper magnitude limit determined by using MGR model is more reasonable.
出处 《地震学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期331-338,共8页 Acta Seismologica Sinica
基金 宁夏回族自治区科技攻关计划项目"宁夏及邻区中强以上地震震后趋势判定及强余震的预测研究"(102164170)资助
关键词 震级-频度关系 震级上限 震级极限值 非线性b值 magnitude-frequency relation upper limit magnitude magnitude limit nonlinear b-value
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1成尔林.震级—频度关系的修改及其对部分地震区带的应用[J].西北地震学报,1993,15(3):33-37. 被引量:4
  • 2黄玮琼,李文香,曹学锋.中国大陆地震资料完整性研究之二──分区地震资料基本完整的起始年分布图象[J].地震学报,1994,16(4):423-432. 被引量:137
  • 3赵振.大震前震级-频度关系中参数目的减小.地震科学研究,1983,(1):5-9.
  • 4宇津德治.1978.地震のァタニチェト分布式バメタの推定:最大地震のァタニチェト分布式バメタの场合[J].地震,31(4):367-382.
  • 5CorneU C A, Vanmarcke E. 1969. The major influences on seismicrisk[C]//Proc 4th World Conference On Earthquake Engineering. Santiago de Chile: 15-19 January.
  • 6Dargahi-Noubary G R. 1983. A procedure for estimation of the upper bound for earthquake magnitudes[J].hys Earth Planet Interi, 33(2) :91- 93.
  • 7Frohlich C. 1998. Does maximum earthquake size depend on focal depth? [J].Bull Seism Soc Amer, 88(2) : 329-336.
  • 8Gutenberg B, Richter C F. 1954. Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena[M]. Princeton, New Jersey:Prin ceton University Press.
  • 9Kijko A, Sellevoll M A. 1989. Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part I : Utiliza tion of extreme and complete catalogues with different threshold magnitudes[J]. Bull Seisrn Soc Amer, 79(3) : 645 - 654.
  • 10Koko A, Sellevoll M A. 1992. Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part 1I : Incorpo ration of magnitude heterogeneity[J].KTR Bull Seism Soc Amer, 82 (1) : 120-134.

二级参考文献6

共引文献139

同被引文献36

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部