期刊文献+

HLA-A33表型、TNF-α/TNF-RⅡ基因多态性和肠道病毒71型脑炎的相关性研究 被引量:4

Association of HLA-A33 phenotype,TNF-α/TNF-RⅡ promoter polymorphisms with the susceptibility to enterovirus 71 infection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究HLA-A33表型,TNF-α/TNFRⅡ单核苷酸多态性与肠道病毒71型(EV71)感染遗传易感性的关系,探讨不同基因表型对EV71感染患病风险的影响。方法收集2009年9月至2010年10月EV71检测为阳性的急性期中枢神经系统感染患儿123例,根据病情轻重分成轻症组、重症组;提取患儿外周血白细胞的基因组DNA,用序列特异性引物-聚合酶链反应(PCR-SSP)技术检测EV71感染患儿及正常对照儿童HLA-A33表型、TNF-α-308位点的多态性和限制性片段长度多态性-聚合酶链反应(PCR-RFLP)检测TNFRⅡ+196位点的多态性。结果 EV71感染患儿中HLA-A33表型阳性率(24.39%)与健康儿童组阳性率(11.82%)的差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.099,P<0.05)。EV71中枢感染患儿TNF-α-308位点A等位基因频率明显高于正常对照组(χ2=6.367,P<0.05),感染组TNF-α-308GG基因型分布频率显著低于正常对照儿童(χ2=5.393,P<0.05);而轻症组与重症组相比,其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TNFRⅡ+196位点T等位基因频率在EV71感染组与对照组、轻症组与重症组之间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。HLA-A33(+)患儿中,EV71感染组TNFRⅡ+196TG基因型频率明显高于正常对照组(χ2=3.866,P<0.05),而在HLA-A33(-)儿童中,其差异无统计学意义。结论 HLA-A33表型、TNF-α-308位点基因多态性与EV71中枢感染有关,TNF-α-308GG基因型可能为儿童不易感染EV71的保护基因。TNFRⅡ+196位点基因多态性与EV71感染无关;TNFRⅡ+196TG基因型在一定程度上升高了HLA-A33(+)患儿EV71中枢感染的发病概率。 Objective To investigate the genetic susceptibility factors of enterovirus71 (EV71) infection by studying the interactions among HLA-A33 phenotype and TNF-α/TNFR lI by SNP and the information about the effects of different genes on risk of encephalitis of EV71 infection. Methods Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction(RT-PCR) was used to detect the specific primers of EV71 in the faeces of patients with EVT1 infection. Genomic DNA of white blood cell were extracted,then PCR-SSP were used to determine phenotype of HLA-A33 and genotype for the A/G polymorphism at-308 position of TNF-α gene and PCR-RFLP was used to genotype for the T/ G polymorphism at + 196 position of TNFR II gene. Results Compared with that of the normal children, there were obvious statistical significance in EV71 infection patients of the rate of HLA-A33 phenotype ( x^2 = 6. 099, P 〈 0.05). In EV71 infection groups, the genotype frequency of TNF-et-308GG was significantly lower than that in normal controls(x^2 =5. 393 ,P 〈0. 05), and the TNF-α-308A allele was more common than in normal group( X^2 = 6. 367, P 〈 0. 05), although there were no obvious statistical significance between mild and critical case groups. There were no obvious statistical significance in the frequencies of TNFR II + 196T allele between the patients and control group (P 〉0. 05). In EV71 group,TG genotype of TNFR II + 196 was more common than in control group based on HLA-A33 phenotype( + ) ( x^2 = 3. 866, P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions The polymorphism of HLA-A33, TNF-α-308 single nueleotide may correlate with EV71 infection ,maybe TNF-α-308GG is the protective genotype which protect children keep away from EV71. Although there is no obvious statistical significance in EV71 infection patients by SNP, the TNFR 11 + 196(TG)may increase the risk of EV71 infection based on HLA-A33 phenotype( + ). [Key words] Enterovirus A,human; HLA antigens; Tumor necrosis factors; Receptors,tumor necrosis factor; Polymorphism,single nucleotide
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2012年第9期44-47,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金(31171212)
关键词 肠道病毒A型 HLA抗原 肿瘤坏死因子类 受体 肿瘤坏死因子 多态性 单核苷酸 Enterovirus A,human HLA antigens Tumor necrosis factors Receptors,tumor necrosisfactor Polymorphism,single nucleotide
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献65

共引文献273

同被引文献54

  • 1郭予雄,翟琼香,何少茹,黄飚,钟敏泉,林晓源,桂娟.MRI与~1H-MRS在重症EV71脑炎中的应用价值[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(11):3313-3316. 被引量:4
  • 2McMinn P, Stratov 1, Nagarajan L, et al. Neurological manifestations of enterovirus 71 infection in children during an outbreak of hand, foot,and mouth disease in Western Australia. Clin Infect Dis,2001, 32 : 236 -242.
  • 3I-Iuang CC, Liu CC, Chang YC, et al. Neurologic complications in children with enterovirus 71 infection[ J]. N Engl J Med, 1999,341 ( 13 ) :936-942. DOI : 10. 1056/NEJM199909233411302.
  • 4Chen SC, Chang HL, Yan TR, et al. An eight-year study of epi- demiologic features of enterovirus 71 infection in Taiwan[ J]. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2007,77(1) :188-191.
  • 5Sun LM, Zheng HY, Zheng HZ, et al. An enterovirus 71 epidem- ic in Guangdong Province of China, 2008 : epidemiological, clini- cal, and virogenic manifestations [ J ]. Jpn J Infect Dis, 2011,64 (1) :13-18.
  • 6Wang X, Peng W, Ren J, et al. A sensor-adaptor mechanism for enterovirus uncoating from structures of EV71 [J]. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2012,19(4) :424-429. DOI: 10. 1038/nsmb. 2255.
  • 7Plevka P, Perera R, Cardosa J, et al. Crystal Structure of Human Enterovirus 71[J]. Science, 2012,336(6086) :1274. DOI: 10. 1126/science. 1218713.
  • 8Chen CS, Yao C, Lin SC, et al. Retrograde axonal transport: a major transmission route of enterovirus 71 in mice [ J l. J Virol, 2007,81 (17) :8996-9003. DOI : 10.1128/JVI. 00236-07.
  • 9Ong KC, Badmanathan M, Devi S, et al. Pathologic characteriza- tion of a murine model of human enterovirus 71 encephalomyelitis [J]. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 2008,67(6):532-542. DOI: 10. 1097/NEN. 0b013e31817713e7.
  • 10Wong KT, Munisamy B, Ong KC, et al. The distribution of in- flammation and virus in human enterovirus 71 encephalomyelitis suggests possible viral spread by neural pathways [ J ]. J Neuro- pathol Exp Neurol, 2008,67 (2) :162-169. DOI: 10. 1097/uen. 0b013e318163a990.

引证文献4

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部