期刊文献+

中央腺前列腺癌表观扩散系数与Gleason评分的相关性 被引量:11

Correlative Study of ADC Value and Gleason Score in Central Gland Prostate Carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究中央腺前列腺癌灶和膀胱内尿液表观扩散系数比值(rADC)与Gleason评分的关系,评价ADC值在中央腺前列腺癌Gleason分级中的诊断价值。资料与方法使用1.5 T MR扫描仪对69例经根治术或穿刺活检病理证实的前列腺癌患者进行扩散加权成像(DWI)检查,b值取0和800 s/mm2,分别测量中央腺癌灶和膀胱内尿液相对ADC值,计算中央腺前列腺癌的rADC;根据病理结果将中央腺前列腺癌分为Gleason 3+3,3+4,4+3,≥4+4四组,将各组中央腺前列腺癌rADC与Gleason评分进行单因素方差分析(one-way ANOVA),并进行组间两两比较。采用Pearson相关分析检验中央腺前列腺癌rADC与Gleason评分的相关性。将中央腺前列腺癌Gleason评分≤7与Gleason评分≥8两组之间分别进行受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线分析,判断低中危组与高危组诊断界值点。结果中央腺前列腺癌Gleason评分3+3组与其余各组间rADC差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),3+4,4+3、≥4+4各组间rADC差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。中央腺前列腺癌rADC与Gleason评分呈负相关(相关系数r=-0.58,P<0.01;),Gleason评分越高,rADC越小。以rADC值0.225作为阈值,鉴别低中危组与高危组中央腺前列腺癌的敏感度和特异度分别为71.4%和85%。结论中央腺前列腺癌ADC值与Gleason评分有一定相关性,有助于中央腺前列腺癌临床危险度的分级判定。 Objective To study the ratio of ADC value(rADC)of prostate carcinoma and urine in bladder in relation to the Gleason histological grading,and to investigate the predictive value of ADC value in grading of prostate carcinoma.Materials and Methods69 patients with the central gland prostate carcinoma proved by ultrasound guided systemic biopsy or radical prostatectomy underwent MR scan with b value of 0 and 800 s/ mm2.The ADC value and ratio of the central gland prostate carcinoma and urine in bladder were measured.The central gland prostate cancer were classified into Gleason 3+3,3+4,4+3,≥4+4,four group,according to the result of pathology.The rADC of the central gland and the four groups Gleason score were analyzed by one way ANOVA,every two groups was compared.Person correlative analysis test of the rADC of the central gland prostate cancer and Gleason score was used.ROC curve between Gleason≤7 and Gleason≥8 of the central gland prostate cancer was used.ResultsThere was a significant difference between Gleason 3+3 and the other groups,but the rest of the differences were not statistically significant.A significant negative correlation was found between rADC and the Gleason scores in central gland(coefficient of correlation r=-0.58,P0.01),the higher the Gleason score was,the smaller the ratio was.The sensitivity of differentiating the medium and high grade cancer was 71.4 %,and the specificity was 85 %,with the cutoff point 0.225 in central gland.ConclusionThere is a significant negative correlation between the ratio of ADC of the central gland prostate carcinoma and Gleason scores,ADC value is helpful for prediction of the central gland prostate carcinoma grade.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期677-680,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
基金 江苏省卫生科研基金资助项目(编号:H200862)
关键词 前列腺癌 表观扩散系数 GLEASON分级 Prostate carcinoma Apparent diffusion coefficient Gleason score
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Andren O, Fall K, Franzen L, et al. How well does the Gleason score predict prostate cancer death? A 20-year followup of a population based cohort in Sweden. J Urol,2006,175:1337.
  • 2Montironi R, Mazzuecheli R, Scarpelli M, et al. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle biopsies or radical prostatectomy specimens: contemporary approach, current clinical significance and sources of pathology discrepancies. BJU Int ,2005,95 : 1146.
  • 3Yagci AB, Ozari N, Aybek Z, et al. The value of diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection and localization. Diagn Interv Radiol,2010.
  • 4Haider MA, van der Kwast TH, Tanguay J, et al. Combined T2- weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. American Journal of Roentgenology,2007,189 : 323.
  • 5Hricak H. MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in the pretreatment evaluation of prostate cancer. British Journal of Radiology, 2005,78 : 103.
  • 6王锡臻,王滨,牛庆亮,张强,刘金刚.磁共振扩散加权成像和ADC值在前列腺癌诊断中的应用价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(6):581-584. 被引量:12
  • 7肖利华,郑晓林,蔡庆文,范宪淼,罗道升.MR扩散加权成像对前列腺癌的诊断价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2010,29(7):923-925. 被引量:15
  • 8王霄英,丁建平,周良平,李飞宇,范晓颖,王继琛,蒋学祥.前列腺癌的MR扩散成像初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(11):1207-1209. 被引量:68
  • 9周桥.前列腺癌Gleason分级[J].中华病理学杂志,2005,34(4):240-243. 被引量:44
  • 10Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Fukabori Y, et al. Prostate Cancer Detection With 3 T MRI : Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Combination With T2-Weighted Imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2010,31:625.

二级参考文献48

  • 1王霄英,周良平,丁建平,王刚,肖江喜,蒋学祥.中国正常成年男性前列腺的MRS定量分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2003,19(5):576-578. 被引量:24
  • 2郑晓林,徐辉雄,吕明德,谢晓燕,徐作峰.扩散加权MRI定性诊断肝脏局灶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(2):173-176. 被引量:67
  • 3王霄英,丁建平,周良平,李飞宇,范晓颖,王继琛,蒋学祥.前列腺癌的MR扩散成像初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(11):1207-1209. 被引量:68
  • 4李飞宇,王霄英,许玉峰,肖江喜,蒋学祥.良性前列腺增生的ADC值定量分析[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,23(5):661-664. 被引量:40
  • 5Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR,2007,188 : 1622.
  • 6Koyama T,Togashi K. Functional MR imaging of the female pelvis. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2007,25:1101.
  • 7Nakamura H, Yamada K, Kizu O, et al. Effect of thin-section diffusion-weighted MR imaging on stroke diagnosis. AJNR ,2005,26:560.
  • 8Issa B. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2002,16 : 196.
  • 9Kim JH, Kim JK, Park BW, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient: prostate cancer versus noncancerous tissue according to anatomical region. J Magn Reson Imaging,2008,28 : 1173.
  • 10Ren J, Huan Y, Wang H, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in normal prostate and differential diagnosis of prostate diseases. Abdom Imaging,2008,33:724.

共引文献125

同被引文献94

引证文献11

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部