期刊文献+

基于解剖在线测量的调强放疗三维剂量验证系统测试与应用 被引量:12

A clinical test and application research of IMRT dose verification system based on patient's anatomical structure and on-line dosimetry
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的测试基于患者解剖图像和矩阵探测器在线测量进行重建(RDBMOM)的调强放疗(IMRT)三维剂量验证系统的准确性,评估其临床应用可行性。方法分别在体模设计规则野和非规则野测试计划,同时以指形电离室和二维电离室阵列测量各测试例的点剂量和平面剂量分布,评估RDBMOM系统剂量重建精度。选择2例鼻咽癌IMRT计划做RDBMOM验证,分析验证结果的临床应用意义。结果与指形电离室点测量结果比较,RDBMOM系统对各测试例的重建剂量偏差均〈1%(3cm×3cm小野除外),IMRT测试例的重建剂量偏差最大为2.12%。与电离室阵列测量比较,RDBMOM重建的测量平面内离轴剂量分布曲线符合良好,两者比较的1通过率(3%/3mm)为94.56%~100%。2例IMRT计划的RDBMOM验证结果整体γ通过率〉99%;计划靶体积γ通过率〉98%且D95误差〈0.4%,腮腺和晶体平均剂量的最大误差分别达2.97%和59.58%。结论测试系统剂量重建精度可满IMRT验证要求,并能给出与患者解剖结构相关的体积剂量误差与误差位置等信息,有利于评估其对临床的影响。 Objective To test a three-dimensional dose verification system, which reconstructing dose to anatomy based on modeling and online measurements (RDBMOM) , and to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of its application in clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) quality assurance. Methods Phantom plans of regular and irregular fields were selected for the testing. All test plans were implemented and the dose distributions were measured using the thimble ion-chamber and two-dimensional ion-chamber array, the accuracy of RDBMOM were then evaluated by comparing the corresponding results. Two practical treated nasopharyngeal carcinoma IMRT plans were verified with RDBMOM and the clinic significancy were valued. Results Compared with measurements of the thimble ion-chamber, deviations of RDBMOM were within 1% in all tested cases except small field of 3 cm ~ 3 cm. The largest deviation of reconstructed dose in IMRT cases was 2. 12%. The dose profile reconstructed by RDBMOM coincided with the measurement using two-dimensional ion-chamber array. The γ rates (3%/3 mm) were 94. 56% - 100%. The RDBMOM verification of IMRT cases shown that the γ rate 〉 99% in total and 〉 98% in planning target volume, deviation in D95 〈 0. 4%, but the largest deviations in mean dose of the parotids and lens were 2. 97% and 59.58% respectively. Conclusions Accuracy of the tested system satisfies the demand of IMRT dose verification. RDBMOM is able to provide information of volumetric dosimetry and anatomical location of dose error, which is benefit for evaluating the clinical value of verification results.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期271-275,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(10975086)
关键词 调强放射疗法 质量保证 三维剂量验证 剂量学 在线 Intensity-modulated radiotherapy Quality assurance Three-dimensional dose verification Dosimetry, on-line
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1Zhu XR, Jursinic PA, Grimm DF, et al. Evaluation of Kodak EDR2 film for dose verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered by a static multileaf collimator [J]. Med Phys, 2002, 29(8): 1687-1692.
  • 2Pai S, Das IJ, Dempsey JF, et al. TG-69: radiographic film for megavoltage beam dosimetry [J]. Med Phys, 2007, 34(6): 2228-2258.
  • 3Buonamici FB, Compagnucci A, Marrazzo L, et al. An intercomparison between film dosimetry and diode matrix for iMRT quality assurance [J]. Med Phys, 2007,34(4): 1372-1379.
  • 4Jack Y, Ken R. IMRT verification with MapCHECK, AAPM conference [C]. July 2005, Seattle, U.S.A.
  • 5Cilia S, Viola P, Azario L, et al. Comparison of measured and computed portal dose for IMRT treatment [J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2006,7(3):65- 79.
  • 6Bhagat A, Datjit S. Saini, et al. IMRT QA with 2-Dimensional diode array of detectors [C]. ICMP and silver Jubilee AMPI conference, October 2004, New Delhi, India.
  • 7Jursinic PA, Nelms BE. A 2-D diode array and analysis software for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery [J]. Med Phys, 2003,30(5):870-879.
  • 8Sun WZ, Chert LX, Sun HQ, et al. The investigation of the characteristics of a new thimble chamber [J]. Chin J Med Phys, 2009,26(2):1063-1066.
  • 9Flu YM. Radiation Oncology Physics [M]. Beijing: Atomic Press, 1999: 538-541.
  • 10Letourneau D, Gulam M, Yan D, et al. Evaluation of a 2D diode array for iMRT quality assurance [J]. Radiother Qncol, 2004, 70(2):199-206.

共引文献9

同被引文献64

  • 1孔蕾,于甬华,黄伟,何为.宫颈癌调强放疗新进展[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(5):426-428. 被引量:28
  • 2Zhen H, Nelms BE, Tom6 WA. Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-hased QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA [J]. Med Phys,2011,38:5477-5489.
  • 3Ezzell GA, Galvin JM, Low D, et al. Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT:report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee [ J]. Med Phys,2003,30:2089-2115.
  • 4Bedford JL, Warrington AP. Commissioning of volumetric modulated arc: therapy (VMAT) [Jl. Int J Radiat Oneol Biol Ph ys, 2009,73 : 537 -545.
  • 5Yan G, Lu B, Kozelka J, et al. Calibration of a rowel four- dimensional diode array [ J]. Med Phys,2010,37 : 108-115.
  • 6Low DA, Harms WB, Mutie S, et al. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions [J]. Med Phys,1998, 25:656-661.
  • 7Nelms BE, Zhen HM, Tome WA. Per-beam planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose error [ J]. Med Phys,2011,38 : 1037-1043.
  • 8Carrasco P, Jornet N, Latorre A, et al. 3D DVH-based metric analysis versus per-beam planar analysis in IMRT pretreatment verification [ J]. Med Phys,20121,39:5040-5049.
  • 9Wolfsberger LD, Wagar M, Nitseh P, et al. Angular dose dependence of Matrixx TM and its calibration [J]. J Appl ClinMed Phys,2010,11:3057.
  • 10Nelms BE, Opp D, Robinson J, et al. VMAT QA:measurernent- guided 4D dose reconstruction on a patient [J]. Med Phys,2012, 39:4228-4238.

引证文献12

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部