期刊文献+

强脉冲光及微晶磨削治疗面部寻常性痤疮的疗效分析

Comparison of therapeutic effect on facial acne vulgaris with intense pulsed light and crystallitic dermabrasion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较强脉冲光和微晶磨削治疗不同时期面部寻常性痤疮的临床疗效。方法:将90例痤疮患者随机分为两组:A组:48例,采用强脉冲光治疗;B组:42例,采用微晶磨削治疗。治疗时间各组分别为1个疗程,治疗后观察两组的临床疗效。结果:强脉冲光治疗针对轻中度痤疮效果明显,微晶磨削治疗针对重度尤其是脓疱性痤疮及其痤疮后留下的凹陷性瘢痕效果显著,差异有显著统计学意义。结论:不同时期的痤疮采用不同方法治疗可以取得较好的临床疗效。 Objective To compare the clinical therapeutic effect on different staging of facial acne vulgaris with intense pulsed light (IPL) and crystallitic dermabrasion. Methods 90 patients with acne were randomly divided into group A(48 patients) and group B(42 patients).Group A were treated with intense pulsed light, group B were treated with crystallitic dermabrasion.Observe the effect of 2 groups after one course of treatment. Results The efficiency rate of IPL in treatment on mild and moderate acne was clearly higher than crystallitic dermabrasion. The efficiency rate of crystallitic dermabrasion in treatment on severe acne,especially pustule and scars,was clearly higher than IPL.The differences of efficiency rate are statistically meaningful (P〈O.05). Conclusion Patients with different staging of facial ache vulgaris should be treated with different remedy to .qet better clinical curative effect.
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2012年第6期964-966,共3页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词 强脉冲光 微晶磨削 寻常性痤疮 Intense pulsed light Crystallitic dermabrasion Acne vulgaris
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献33

共引文献408

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部