期刊文献+

舒尼替尼一线治疗转移性肾细胞癌的临床观察 被引量:4

Clinical observation of Sunitinib as first line treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察舒尼替尼一线治疗转移性肾细胞癌的有效性及安全性。方法:16例未经治疗的转移性肾细胞癌患者接受舒尼替尼治疗。14例患者口服舒尼替尼50mg/d,服用4周休息2周,6周重复;2例患者口服37.5mg/d,持续服用。结果:16例患者均可评价疗效和毒性。PR 5例,SD 9例,PD 2例;ORR为31.3%(5/16),DCR为87.5%(14/16)。中位PFS和OS分别为10.5(95%CI:1.5~19.5)和17.5个月(95%CI:1.6~33.4)。常见非血液学不良反应为手足综合征(12/16,75.0%)、乏力(11/16,68.8%)、口腔炎(8/16,50.0%)、高血压(8/16,50.0%)、纳差(9/16,56.3%)以及蛋白尿(6/16,37.5%);血液学主要不良反应为白细胞下降(10/16,62.5%)、血小板下降(9/16,56.3%)。3~4级不良反应主要有口腔炎(3/16,18.8%)、高血压(2/16,12.5%)、手足综合征(2/16,12.5%)、白细胞减少(2/16,12.5%)和血小板减少(2/16,12.5%)。结论:舒尼替尼对未经治疗的中国人晚期肾细胞癌疗效确切,毒副反应可预见、可控制和可逆转,值得临床推荐使用。 OBJECTIVE:To observe the effectiveness and safety of sunitinib as first line treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: Sixteen patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated with sunitinib. Forteen patients received sunitinib 50 mg daily for 4 weeks,followed 2 weeks off, every 6 weeks repeat; and 2 patients received sunitinib 37.5 mg daily continuously. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in efficacy and toxicity analyses. Five patients achieved PR, nine patients achieved SD, 2. patients PD, the ORR was 31.3% (5/16), and the DCR was 87.5%(14/16). The median PFS and median OS were 10.5 months (95%CI: 1.5--19.5) and 17.5 months (95%CI: 1.6- 33.4). Common non-hematological toxicities included hand-foot syndrome (12/16,75.0%), fatigue (11/16,68.8%), stomatitis (8/16,50.0%), hypertension (8/16,50.0%), anorexia (9/16, 56.3%) and proteinuria (6/16,37.5%). Common hematological toxicities included leucopenia (10/16,62.5%) and thrombocytopenia (9/16, 56.3%). 3/4 grade toxicities included stomatitis (3/16, 18.8%), hypertension (2/16, 12.5%), hand-foot syndrome (2/16,12.5 % ), leueopenia (2/16,12.5 % ) and thrombocytopenia (2/16,12.5 % ). CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib is effective for previously untreated chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and the toxicities are predictable and controllable and reversible. It was recommendable for clinical use.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第5期368-371,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 转移性肾细胞癌 舒尼替尼 靶向治疗 metastatic renal cell careinoma^Sunitinih~ targeted therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献35

  • 1王亚明,田增民.PTEN肿瘤抑制基因和细胞间信号传导研究进展[J].海军总医院学报,2004,17(3):167-171. 被引量:5
  • 2张宁,龚侃,果宏峰,那熙,吴关,杨新宇,辛殿旗,那彦群.散发性肾透明细胞癌组织中VHL基因突变、血管内皮生长因子表达及其与微血管形成的关系[J].中华医学杂志,2004,84(19):1620-1624. 被引量:15
  • 3Martel CL, Lara PN. Renal cell carcinoma: current status and future directions. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2003, 45: 177-190.
  • 4Whelan P. The medical treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer. EAU Update Series, 2003, 1: 237-246.
  • 5Kondo K, Yao M, Yoshida M, et al. Comprehensive mutational analysis of the VHL gene in sporadic renal cell earcinoma: relationship to clinicopathological parameters. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 2002, 34: 58-68.
  • 6Okuyama M, Fujiwara Y, Hayakawa T, et al. Esophagogastric varices due to arterioportal shunt in a serous cystadenoma of the pancreas in von Hippel-Lindau disease. Dig Dis Sci, 2003, 48: 1948-1954.
  • 7Na X, Duan HO, Messsing EM, et al. Identification of the RNA polymerase subunit hsRPB7 as a novel target of the yon Hippel-Lindau protein. EMBO J, 2003, 22: 4249-4259.
  • 8Tsutsumi H, Miyamoto C, Furuichi Y, et al. VHL tumor suppressor gene: its mutation and protein level in renal cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep, 2003, 10: 1357-1361.
  • 9Rathmell WK, Martz CA, Rini BI. Renal cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Oncol, 2007, 19:234-240.
  • 10Novick AC, Campbell SC. Renal tumors//Walsh PC,Retik AB, Vaughan ED, et al. Campbell's urology. 4. 8th ed. Philadelphia:Saunders, 2002: 2672-2731.

共引文献5

同被引文献39

  • 1WeinAJ,郭应禄,周立群译.坎贝尔-沃尔什泌尿外科学[M].9版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2009:2645-2648.
  • 2Kumar S,Bansal P, Tiwari P, et al. Renal plemomorphie undif- ferentiated sarcoma:A rarity[J].Saudi Jornal of Kidney Disea- ses and Transplantation,2012,23(6):1241-1242.
  • 3Hofvander J, Tayebwa J, Nilsson J, et al. Recurrent PRDM10 gene fusions in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma[J].Clini- cal Cancer Research,2014,20(24) :2399.
  • 4Patel DP, Gandhi YS, Sommers KE, et al. Primary pulmonary malignant fibrous histiocytoma[J].Case Rep Pulmonol, 2015, 11(10) :276-381.
  • 5Altunkol A, Savas M, Ciftci H, et al. Primary giant cell malig- nant fibrous histiocytoma-associated with renal calculus[J]. CanUrol Assoc J,2014,8(3-4) :193-195.
  • 6Tong L, Wang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Surgical management of giant secondary malignant fibrous histiocytoma following radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A case report and literature re- view[J]. Oncology letters, 2014, 8(1): 72-76.
  • 7Vincenzi B, Frezza AM, Santini D, et al. New therapiesin soft tissue sarcoma[J]. Expert Opin EmergDrugs, 2010,15 (2) : 237-248.
  • 8Sheplan LJ,Juliano JJ. Use of radiation therapy for patients with soft-tissue and bone sarcomas[J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2010,77 (Suppl 1) :27-29.
  • 9Adrien D, Ludger KH, Ingo S, et al. Malignant fibrous histio- cytoma-pleomorphic sarcoma, NOS gene expression, histology and clinical course. A pilot study[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2010,395(3) :261-275.
  • 10Pathrose G, John N T, Manojkumar R. A rare case of malig- nant fibrous histiocytoma/pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma of the kidney[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2015,9(1) : 27-29.

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部