期刊文献+

棉田绿盲蝽种群密度的调查方法 被引量:5

Sampling techniques for estimating the population density of Apolygus lucorum in cotton fields
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文比较研究了棉田绿盲蝽Apolygus lucorum(Meyer-Dür)种群的调查方法。全株调查法中,目测法调查到的绿盲蝽种群密度最高,显著高于扫网法和盆拍法。局部调查法发现,蕾上的绿盲蝽种群数量显著高于叶片和花上;蕾上种群数量与整株密度之间呈显著正相关关系(y=1.18 x+3.69)。间接调查法表明:在苗期和蕾期,叶片受害等级和绿盲蝽种群密度之间呈显著正相关关系(苗期:y=25.28 x+8.20;蕾期:y=43.99 x+27.58)。 Sampling methods for estimating the abundance of Apolygus lucorum(Meyer-Dur) were compared in cotton field in Langfang, Hebei Province during 2009--2010. The results show that the population density estimate obtained by the visual count method was significantly higher than that obtained by the sweep-net and drop-tray methods. Density on cotton buds was higher than on cotton flowers and leaves. Moreover, there was a simple linear relationship (y = 1.18 x + 3.69) between the population density on buds (x) and that on whole plants (y). At the seedling and budding stages there was a significant correlation ( seedling period, y = 25.28 x + 8.20; budding period, y = 43.99 x + 27.58) between the population density of A. lucorum (x) and the degree of leaf damage (y). All the above information provides options for sampling this important pest.
出处 《应用昆虫学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期610-613,共4页 Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology
基金 公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200903004)
关键词 绿盲蝽 种群密度 棉花 调查方法 Apolygus lucorum, population density, cotton, sampling methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Blackmer JL, Byers JA, Rodriguez-Saona C Evaluation of color traps for monitoring Lygus spp. :design, placement, height, time of day, and non-targeteffects. crop Prot. , 27(2) :171-181. 2008.
  • 2Byedy KF, Gutierrez AP, Jones RE, Luck RF, 1978. A comparison of sampling methods for some arthropod population in cotton. Hilgardia, 46 ( 8 ) :257-282.
  • 3Fleischer SJ, Gaylor MJ, Edelson JV, 1985. Estimatingabsolute density from relative sampling of Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae) and selected predators in early to mid-season cotton. Environ. Entomol. , 14(6) :709-717.
  • 4Garcia A, Gonzalez D, Leigh TF, 1982. Three methods of sampling arthropod numbers on California cotton. Environ. Entomol. , 11 (3) :565-572.
  • 5Gore J, 2005. Tarnished plant bug sampling and management in the Mississippi Delta. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, January 4-7. Memphis: 1234-1238.
  • 6Leigh TF, Gonzalez D, Bosh RDV, 1970. A sampling device for estimating absolute insect populations on cotton. J. Econ. Entomol. , 63 (5) : 1704-1706.
  • 7Lu YH, Qiu F, Feng HQ, Li HB, Yang ZC, Wyckhuys KAG, Wu KM, 2008. Species composition and seasonal abundance of pestiferous plant bugs ( Hemiptera: Miridae) on Bt cotton in China. Crop Prot. , 27(3/5) :465-472.
  • 8Lu YH, Wu KM, Jiang YY, Xia B, Li P, Feng HQ, Wyckhuys KAG, 2010. Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple crops correlated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China. Science, 328(5982) :1151-1154.
  • 9Mueller A, Stern V, 1973. Lygus flight and dispersal behavior. Environ. Entomol. , 2(3):361-364.
  • 10Musser F, Stewart S, Bagwell R, Lorenz G, Catchot A, Burris E, Cook D, Bobbins J, Greene J, Studebaker G, Gore J, 2007. Comparison of direct and indirect sampling methods for tarnished plant bug (Hemiptera: Miridae) in flowering cotton. J. Econ. Entomol. , 100 (6) : 1916-1923.

二级参考文献65

  • 1郭建英,周洪旭,万方浩,刘小京,韩召军.两种防治措施下转Bt基因棉田绿盲蝽的发生与为害[J].昆虫知识,2005,42(4):424-428. 被引量:39
  • 2张永孝.棉花不同生育期棉盲蝽的为害损失及防治指标研究.植物保护学报,1986,13(2):73-77.
  • 3沈其益.棉叶切病之研究.中国棉产改进所专刊,1936,(2):120-124.
  • 4HARDEE D D, BRYAN W W. Influence of Bacillus thuringiensis-transgenic and nectariless cotton on insect populations with emphasis on the tarnished plant bug (Heteroptera: Miridae)[J]. JEconEntomol, 1997,90:663-668.
  • 5BAUER P J, MCALISTER Ⅲ D D, ROOF M E. Evidence that light stink bug damage does not influence open end yarn processing performance[J]. J Cotton Sci, 2006,10:161 - 167.
  • 6MUELLER A J, STERN V M. Lygus flight and dispersal behavior[J]. Environ Entomol, 1973,2:361 - 364.
  • 7BANCROFT J S. Dispersal and abundance of Lygus hesperus in field crop[J]. Environ Entomol, 2005,34:1517- 1523.
  • 8NORDLUND D A. The Lygus problem[J]. Southern Entomol, 2000, Suppl, 23:1 - 5.
  • 9LAYTON M B. Biology and damage of the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris, in cotton[J]. Southwestern Entomol, 2000, Suppl, 23 : 7 - 20.
  • 10CARRIERE Y, ELLSWORTH P C, DUTILLEUL P C, et al. A GIS-based approach for areawide pest management: the scales of Lygus hesperus movements to cotton from alfalfa, weeds, and cotton[J]. Entomol Exp Appl, 2006, 118:203 - 210.

共引文献57

同被引文献64

  • 1李进步,吕昭智,王登元,田长彦.新疆棉区主要害虫的演替及其机理分析[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(3):261-264. 被引量:39
  • 2郭建英,周洪旭,万方浩,刘小京,韩召军.两种防治措施下转Bt基因棉田绿盲蝽的发生与为害[J].昆虫知识,2005,42(4):424-428. 被引量:39
  • 3能乃扎布,石凯,宝爱萍.合垫盲蝽亚科中国一新纪录属及一新种记述(半翅目,异翅亚目,盲蝽科)[J].动物分类学报,2006,31(3):585-587. 被引量:3
  • 4冯成玉.棉花盲蝽产卵习性的调查.昆虫知识,1987,24(4):213-215.
  • 5刘仰青,吴孔明,薛芳森.盲蝽象抗药性治理的研究进展[J].华东昆虫学报,2007,16(2):141-148. 被引量:23
  • 6Dong JW, Pan HS, Lu YH, Yang YZ, 2013. Nymphal performance correlated with adult preference for flowering host plants in a polyphagous mirid bug, Apolygus lucorum (Heteroptera: Miridae). Arthropod-Plantlnteractions, 7(1): 83-91.
  • 7Lu YH, Jiao ZB, Li GP, Wyckhuys KAG, Wu KM, 2011. Comparative overwintering host range of three Adelphocoris species (Hemiptera: Miridae) in northern China. Crop Prot., 30: 1455-1460.
  • 8Lu YH, Qiu F, Feng HQ, Li HB, Yang ZC, Wyckhuys KAG, Wu KM, 2008. Species composition and seasonal abundance of pestiferous plant bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae) on Bt cotton in China. Crop Prot., 27(3/5): 465-472.
  • 9Lu YH, Wu KM, 2011. Mirid bugs in China: pest status and management strategies. Outlooks on Pest Management, 22(6): 248-252.
  • 10Lu YH, Wu KM, Jiang YY, Xia B, Li P, Feng HQ, Wyckhuys KAG, Guo YY, 2010a. Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple crops correlated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China. Science, 328(5982): 1151-1154.

引证文献5

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部