期刊文献+

主动脉瓣置换术后室间隔厚度对主动脉瓣跨瓣压差的影响 被引量:2

The influence of interventricular septal thickness to trans-aortic valve pressure after aortic valve replacement
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨主动脉瓣置换术后室间隔厚度对主动脉瓣跨瓣压差的影响。方法2005年1月至2010年12月,接受主动脉瓣置换术患者273例,全部为单纯主动脉瓣狭窄。根据手术时使用的主动脉瓣不同品牌,将患者分为3组:Regent组、On—X组、其他品牌组。定义术后跨瓣压差大小为:轻度(0~30mmHg,1mmHg=0.133kPa)、中度(30~60mmHg)及重度(大于60mmHg)。分别比较术前、术后测量的左心室收缩期末径、左心室舒张期末径、左心室射血分数(EF值)和室间隔厚度。结果3组患者术前的左心室收缩期末径、左心室舒张期末径及EF值差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。Regent组患者,术后跨瓣压差为重度的患者术前室间隔厚度明显多于轻、中度(P〈0.05)。使用On—X组患者,术后跨瓣压差为重度与中度的患者术前室间隔厚度者明显多于轻度组(P〈0.05)。其他品牌组患者,术后跨瓣压差为重度的患者术前室间隔厚度明显多于中、轻度组(P〈0.05)。结论行主动脉瓣置换术后,术前室间隔厚度大于13.6mm的患者其主动脉瓣跨瓣压差较厚度小于13.6mm的患者显著增高。室间隔厚度大于15.3mm的患者,应同期行室间隔部分切除或替换无支架瓣膜以减少主动脉瓣替换后的跨瓣乐善。 Objective To investigate the effects of interventricular septal thickness (IST) on postoperative trans-aortic valve pressure after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods 273 patients were divided into 3 groups with different me- chanical valves and postoperative trans-aortie valve pressure (TAVP). Hemodynamic parameters including left ventricular end diastolic diameter, left ventrieular end systolic diameter, ejection fraction and IST were analyzed. Results There was no sig- nificant difference in left ventrieular diastolic diameter, left ventricular systolic diameter and ejection fraction in three groups with different mechanical valves ( P 〉 0.05 ). In patients with St. Jude Regent valve, preoperative IST in severe TAVP group was significantly thicker than those of moderate and mild groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). In patients with On-x valve, preoperative IST in severe and moderate TAVP groups were thicker than that of mild group (P 〈 0.05 ). In patients with other mechanical valve, preoperative IST in severe TAVP group is greater than those of moderate and mild groups (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Interven- tricular septal thickness did have positive influence on postoperative trans-aortic valve pressure after AYR. When IST was more than 13.6mm, the postoperative trans-aortic valve pressure after aortic valve replacement was higher than the IST was less than 13.6mm. When IST was thicker than 15.3mm, partial ventricular septal resection or replacement of stentless valve should be considered.
出处 《中华胸心血管外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期282-284,288,共4页 Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
关键词 心脏瓣膜疾病 心脏瓣膜假体植入 心室功能障碍 Heart valve disease Heart valve prosthesis implantation Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献53

  • 1Elayda MA, Hall R J, Reul RM, et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years and older: operative risks and long-term results [ J]. Circulation, 1993, 88(part 2): 11-6.
  • 2Notzold A, Huppe M, Schmidtke C, et al. Quality of life in aortic valve replacement: pulmonary autografts versus mechanical prostheses[J]. JAm Coil Cardiol, 2001, 37: 1963-6.
  • 3MeHomey CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JFR, et al. The MOS 36 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF 36): tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups [J]. Med Care, 1994, 32: 40-66.
  • 4Ware JE, Sherboume CD. The MOS SF-36 Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection [J ]. Med Care, 1992, 30: 473-81.
  • 5Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention[J].J Am Coil Cardiol, 2000, 36:1131-41.
  • 6Westaby S, Huysmans H, David TE. Stentless aortic bioprostheses: Compelling data from the second international symposium [J].Ann Thorac Surg, 1998, 65: 235-40.
  • 7David TE, Puschmann R, Ivanov J, et al. Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: a case match study [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1998, 116: 236-41.
  • 8Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement[J]. Circulation, 2003, 108: 983-8.
  • 9Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG, et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves[J]. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg, 2004, 127: 149-59.
  • 10Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WR, et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement [J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2003, 126: 783-93.

共引文献10

同被引文献20

  • 1侯晓彤,孟旭,李伟,王坚刚.左心系统瓣膜替换术后远期三尖瓣关闭不全的手术治疗效果[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(47):3362-3364. 被引量:11
  • 2Hahm SY, Choo SJ, Lee JW, et al. Novel technique of aortic valvulo-plasty. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2006, 29(5): 530-536.
  • 3Song MG. Aortic valve reconstruction with leaf replacement and sinotubular junction fixation early and midterm results. Soc Thorac Surg, 2014, 12(11): 154-156.
  • 4Song MG. Song innovative aortic root and valve reconstruction. Korea Koonja Publishing, 2013, 11(2): 236-238.
  • 5Tanigawa K, Eishi K, Yamachika S, et al. Comparison of the effectsof aortic valve replacement using 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards Peri-mount bioprosthesis and 19 mm Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008, 14(8): 17.
  • 6Bernal JM, Pontyn A, Diaz B, et al. Combined mitral and tricuspid valve repair in rheumatic valve disease: fewer reoperations with prosthetic ring annuloplasty. Circulation, 2010, 12(8): 1934-1940.
  • 7Yoda M, Tanabe H, Kadoma Y, et al. Mid-term results of tricuspid annuloplasty using the MC3 ring for secondary tricuspid valve regurgitation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2011, 13(1): 7-10.
  • 8MeCarthy P, Bhudia S, Rajeswaran J. Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004, 12(7): 674-685.
  • 9Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, et al. Impact of prosthesis patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, mot-bidity, and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprostheticheart valve. J Heart Valve Dis, 1998, 7(2): 11-12.
  • 10Tang GH, David TE, Singh SK, et al. Tricuspid valve repair with an annuloplasty ring results in improved long-term outcomes. Circulation, 2006, 114(1): 1577-1581.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部