汉语动词是名词的一个次类吗?

Is Verb a Subcategory of Noun in Chinese?

为摆脱汉语词类问题的困境,有学者提出了两个模式:"关联标记"模式和"包含"模式。我们认为,词类和职位本来即非一一对应,而"包含模式"更值得商榷。所谓动词是名词的一个次类,犯了以偏概全的逻辑错误,使用隐喻论证,说服力不强。包含模式抹杀了实词内部的界限。动词、名词、形容词是三个相对独立的词类,它们在语义、句法、语用功能上有交叉之处。

In order to extricate himself from the two dilemmas in dealing with word classes in Chinese,one of scholar has put forward two models：Correlated Markedness and Inclu- sion. We hold that the word class does not correspond with the grammatical function, henceforth there does not exist the so-called ＂first dilemma＂. In the second model,the ar- ticle holds that verbs are viewed as a subcategory of nouns. We consider it hard to be acceptable. The loophole consists in the following aspects：the statement itself violates the principle ＂substituting extremes for whole＂ in terms of formal logic. It is well-known that Chinese is characteristic of being void of intlection,which still needs explicating. Neverthe- less,the article makes use of it to ascertain its views. Therefore,the article seems to retain circularity as regards demonstration. Besides,in elaborating upon the two terms ＂realization ＆ constitution＂ ,the article uses metaphor to testify its view. The application of metaphor is usually inconvincible. As a whole,we suppose that nouns,adjectives and verbs are independent of each other and overlap semantically,syntactically and pragmatically.