《最近二十年中国旧学之进步》作者考辨——兼论其学术史意义

On Analysis of the Author of"the Progress of the Old Chinese Iearning in Recent Twenty Years"——And Discussing Its Academic Significance

1922年《东方杂志》十九卷第三号上发表的《最近二十年中国旧学之进步》,介绍了20世纪最初20年旧学的发展概况,与当时居于思想界、学界主流的章太炎、梁启超、胡适等人的认知不同,从另一视角解读了近代文化转移时期中国学术发展之一面相。文章署名抗父,即樊炳清(少泉)。然而,从王国维致罗振玉书信及相关史实的梳理、文章内容与行文风格,尤其是与王氏后来所作《最近二三十年新发见之学问》比较看,该文当出自王国维之手,体现了他对这一时期学术发展的认知与自我评定,具有重要的学术史意义。

＂The progress of the old Chinese learning in recent twenty years＂ in＂ The Eastern Miscellany＂ 19,3 （ 1922 ） introduced the latest state of play in the old Chinese learning in the first 20 years of the 20th century, which unscrambled the other aspect of the development of China academic in the transfer of modern cuhure period at a different angle with Zhang Tai Yan, Liang Qi Chao and Hu Shi etc, who lived in the intellectual, academic mainstream at that time. The author of this article was Kang Fu, namely Fan Bing Qing （ Shao Quan）. However, the author of this article should be Wang Guo through the letters Wang Guo Wei addressed to Luo Zhen Yu and the relevant facts of the letters, the article content and drafting style, especially comparing with＂ The new discovered Chinese learn- ing in last three decades＇Wang Guo Wei wrote soon afterwards,. This article embodied his cognition of the academic development and self-assessment during this period, and had its important value of the academic history.