摘要
"革命文学"倡导和"无产阶级革命文学"论争有比较长的过程,学界一般将其源头追溯到早期共产党人的革命文学主张。如果把"革命文学"与"无产阶级革命文学"适度区别开来,那么,至少可以清晰地看到三种关于"革命文学"的想象,即文学研究会、早期共产党人、创造社"元老"们分别倡导的"革命文学"。这三种"革命文学"想象彼此有很大的差异,显示了"革命文学"源头的不同建构和意向。对这三种"革命文学"建构与想象的历史分析将突破以往革命文学研究中的某种思维定势,为革命文学研究开拓新的空间和思路。
:The advocacy of "Revolutionary Literature" and the controversy of "Proletarian Revolutionary Literature" last for a relatively long process, which most scholars date back its origin to the revolution literary ideas of the early communists. Distinguishing moderately between the concepts "Revolutionary Literature" and "Proletarian Revolutionary Literature", then, at least the scholars can clearly see three imaginations of the "Revolutionary Literature", which are respectively advocated by the Literary Research Society, early communists and the Creation Club ' s senior members. The three imaginations of "Revolutionary Literature" are very different to each other, which showing the different source of construction and intention of the "Revolutionary Literature". The historical analysis on the constructions and imaginations of three "Revolutionary Literature" is a breakthrough in the revolutionary literature study, which would surmount a certain mindset and open up new space and ideas for revolutionary literature research.
出处
《齐鲁学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第3期131-136,共6页
Qilu Journal
基金
广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目"中国左翼文学思潮的内在差异"(GD11CZW13)
关键词
革命文学
文学研究会
早期共产党人
创造社元老
Revolutionary Literature
the Literary Research Society
early communists
Creation Club' s senior members