期刊文献+

CP-nets的完备性及一致性研究 被引量:7

On the Completeness and Consistency for CP-nets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 CP-nets是一种简单而又直观的图形化偏好表示工具,成为近几年人工智能的一个研究热点.然而,任意二值CP-nets上的强占优算法还没有给出,CP-nets可表示的偏好的完备性还无人研究,CP-nets所能表示的偏好是否一致也还未彻底解决.基于CP-nets上的强占优运算研究CP-nets的完备性和一致性.首先,通过构造CP-nets导出图及其性质的研究,得出强占优的本质是求取翻转关系的传递闭包,从而利用Warshall算法求出可判断任意CP-nets的强占优;其次,通过求取3种不同结构(可分离的、链表结构和树形结构)的CP-nets的偏好个数,给出了CP-nets可表达的偏好的不完备性定理,并给出了可分离的CP-nets中偏好的计数公式;最后,研究CP-nets的一致性,给出了CP-nets的一致性判定定理及其算法.所做工作不仅解决了Boutilier和Goldsmith提出的一些难题,还深化了CP-nets的基础理论研究. CP-nets (conditional preference networks) is a simple and intuitive graphical tool for representing conditional preference statements over the values of a set of variables. It has been a studying hotspot in artificial intelligence recently. The algorithm of strong dominance with respect to any binary-valued CP-nets has not been given; preferences completeness of CP-nets have not been studied by anyone, This paper makes a study of completeness and consistency of CP-nets by designing a strong dominance algorithm. First, by constructing induced graph of CP-nets and studying its properties, the study solves the problem of strong dominance with respect to any binary-valued CP-nets by Warshall algorithm to get the transitive closure of flip relation. Second, by solving the preference number of three kinds of CP-nets (separeble-structured, chain-structured, tree-structured), the study gives preferences incompleteness theorem and counting number formula of separeble condition preference networks. Finally, the study deals with consistency problem, and consistency judgment theorem and algorithm are given. The method not only solves some difficult problems proposed by Boutilier and Goldsmith, but also deepens the basic theory researching of CP-nets.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期1531-1541,共11页 Journal of Software
基金 国家自然科学基金(61170019) 天津市自然科学基金(11JCYBJC00700)
关键词 强占优 偏好的完备性 偏好的一致性 翻转关系的传递闭包 可分离的条件偏好网 判定定理及算法 strong dominance preference completeness preference consistency transitivity closure of flip relation separeble condition preference network judgment theorem and algorithm
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1van Benthem J, van Otterloo S, Roy O. Preference logic, conditionals and solution concepts in games. In: Lagerlund H, Lindstrom S, Sliwinski R, eds. Modality Matters: Twenty-Five Essays in Honour of Krister Segerberg. Uppsala: University of Uppsala, 2006.61-76.
  • 2Brewka G. A rank based description language for qualitative preferences. In: Saitta L, ed. Proc. of the 16th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Valencia: IOS Press, 2004. 303-307.
  • 3Lang J. Logic preference representation and combinatorial vote. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2004,42(1-3): 37-71.
  • 4Coste-Marquis S, Lang J, Liberatore P, Marquis P. Expressive power and succinctness of propositional languages for preference representation. In: Dubois D, Welty C, Williams MA, eds. Proc. of the 9th Int'l Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2004). Menlo Park: AAAI Press, 2004. 203-212.
  • 5Doyle J, Wellman M. Representing preferences as ceteris paribus comparatives. In: Hanks S, Russel S, Wellman M, eds. Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symp. on Decision-Theoretic Planning. Menlo Park: AAAI Press, 1994. 69-75.
  • 6Doyle J. Prospects for preferences. Computational Intelligence, 2004,20(2): 111-136.
  • 7Ozturk M, Tsoukias A, Vincke P. Preference modelling. In: Ehrgott M, Greco S, Figueira J, eds. State of the Art in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005.27-72.
  • 8Kikuti D, Cozman FG, de Campos CP. Partially ordered preferences in decision trees: computing strategies with imprecision in probabilities. In: Brafman R, Junker U, eds. Proc. of Multidisciplinary IJCAI-05 Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling. Edinburgh, 2005. 118-123. http://wikix.ilog.fr/wiki/bin/view/Preference 05/WsProceedings
  • 9Hansson SO. Preference Logic in Handbook of Philosophical Logic. 2nd ed,, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
  • 10von Wright GH. The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision, 1972,3(2): 140-169.

共引文献3

同被引文献42

  • 1Casali A, Godo L, Sierra C. A Graded BDI Agent Model to Repre- sent and Reason About Preferences. Artificial Intelligence, 2011,175(7/8) : 1468-1478.
  • 2Domshlak C, Hfillermeier E, Kaci S, et al. Preferences in AI: An Overview. Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 175 (7/8) : 1037-1052.
  • 3Levandoski J J, Eldawy A, Mokbel M F, et al. Flexible and Exten- sible Preference Evaluation in Database Systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 2013. DOI: 10. 1145/2493268.
  • 4Boutilier C, Brafman R, Domshlak C, et al. CP-nets: A Tool for Representing and Reasoning with Conditional Ceteris Paribus Prefer- ence Statements. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2004, 21 ( 1 ) : 135-191.
  • 5Stefanidis K, Koutrika G, Pitoura E. A Survey on Representation, Composition and Application of Preferences in Database Systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 2011. DOI: 10. 1145/ 2000824,2000829.
  • 6Alkhateeb F, Baget J F, Euzenat J. Extending SPARQL with Regu- lar Expression Patterns ( for Querying RDF). Web Semantics : Sci- ence, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2009, 7 (2) : 57 -73.
  • 7Van Benthem J, Girard P, Roy O. Everything Else Being Equal: A Modal Logic for Ceteris Paribus Preferences. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2009, 38(1): 83-125.
  • 8Angles R, Gutierrez C. Survey of Graph Database Computing Surveys, 2008. DOI: 10,1145/1322432. Models. ACM 1322433.
  • 9Atserias A, Dawar A, Kolaitis P G. On Preservation under Homo- morphisms and Unions of Conjunctive Queries. Journal of the ACM, 2006, 53(2) : 208-237.
  • 10Abiteboul S, Hull R,"Vianu V. Foundations of Databases. Boston, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.

引证文献7

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部