期刊文献+

企业创新绩效影响因素研究 被引量:3

Study on the Factors that Affect the Innovative Performance of Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以广东省134家企业截面数据作为样本,选择新产品销售收入比例指标测度企业的创新绩效,实证分析了企业规模、研发强度、吸收能力等指标与创新绩效之间的关系。结果表明,企业规模、研发强度对企业创新绩效呈现显著负向影响。而吸收能力对企业创新绩效存在显著的正向影响。 This paper took the data of 134 enterprises in Guangdong province as the sample data. We selected the indicators of the proportion of new product sales to measure the innovative performance of enterprises. Besides, this paper conducted empirical analysis about the relationship between firm size, R&D intensity, absorptive capacity and the innovative performance. The results show that firm size, R&D intensity have significant and negative impact on the innovative performance. However, absorptive capacity has a significant and positive effect on the innovative performance.
作者 陈俊 吴进
出处 《价值工程》 2012年第18期138-139,共2页 Value Engineering
关键词 创新绩效 企业规模 研发强度 吸收能力 innovative performance firm size R&D intensity absorptive capacity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1VeugelersR, Cassiman B. Make and Buy in Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing Firms[J]. Research Policy,1999, 28: 63-80.
  • 2ZhaoH, TongX, WongPK, Zhu J. Types otTechnology SolJrcing and Innovative Capability: An Exploratory Study of Singapore Manufacturing Firms [J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2005(16): 209-224.
  • 3KamW P, KieseM, SinghA, WongF. The Pattern of Innovation in Singapore's Manufacturing Sector [J]. Singapore Management Review, 2003, 25 (1): 1-34.
  • 4刘德胜,张玉明.R&D支出驱动中小企业绩效有效性研究[J].科技与经济,2010,23(1):92-96. 被引量:22
  • 5COHEN W M,LEVINTHALAbsorptive capacity:a new perspective on learning and innovation[J],Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999,35(1) : 128-152.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Boer, F. P. Linking R&D to growth and shareholder value [J]. Research & Technology Management, 1994, 37(3):16-22.
  • 2Bean, A.S. Why Some R&D Organizations Are More Productive Than Others [J]. Research-Technology Management, 1995, 38(1): 25 -29.
  • 3Ito, K., Pucik, V. R&D spending, domestic competition, and export performance of Japanese manufacturing finns [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(1):61-75.
  • 4Lee, J., Lee, RC., Zahra, S.A. Dynamics of competition in global high technology industries: A study of the US. and Japanese pharmaceutical companies [J]. Journal of European Marketing, 1994, 3(3&4):77-98.
  • 5Souitaris, V. Research on the determinants of technological innovation: a contingency approach [J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 1999, 3(3):287-305.
  • 6Chamanski, A., Waago, S..I. Organizational performance of technology-based firms The role of technology and business strategies [J].Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2001, 2(3):205-223.
  • 7Lev, B. R&D and Capital Market [J]. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1999, 11(4):21-35.
  • 8Baumol, Wj. Education for innovation: Entrepreneurial breakthroughs versus corporate incremental improvements [J]. NBER Innovation Policy and the Economy, 2006, 5(1):33-56.
  • 9Barney, J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1):99-120.
  • 10Wilbon, A.D. Predicting survival of high-technology initial public offering finns [J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2002, 13(1):127-141.

共引文献21

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部