期刊文献+

四种宫颈病变筛查方法的临床应用评价

Evaluation of four approaches in screening of cervical lesions
原文传递
导出
摘要 对2009年9月至2010年12月本院妇科门诊就诊545例患者,以病理学结果作为金标准,评价高危人乳头状瘤病毒(HR—HPV)检测、液基细胞学检查(LCT)检查、LCT联合HPV序列检测、LCT联合HPV平行检测4种筛查方案在宫颈癌筛查中的临床价值。结果显示平行检测针对同一组研究人群筛查宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅱ级以上病变检出率达到99.17%,正确指数为0.81,显著高于其他筛查方案。 Exfoliative cell samples were collected from 545 patients in outpatient clinic of Kelamayi Centre Hospital from Sep 2009 to Dec 2010. Liquid-based cytology test ( LCT ) and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) test were performed in exfoliative cells; and colposcopic biopsy was undertaken in all patients. With the pathological results as gold standard the diagnostic values of HR-HPV test, LCT test, HPV-LCT serial test and HPV-LCT parallel test were evaluated for cervical cancer screening. The sensitivity of HPV-LCT parallel test was 99. 17% with a Youden's index of 0. 81. Our results indicate that HPV-LCT parallel test can improve significantly the detection rate of cervical cancer screening.
出处 《中华全科医师杂志》 2012年第5期379-380,共2页 Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
关键词 宫颈肿瘤 筛查 Cervical neoplasm Screening
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献18

  • 1苏涛,章桂红,程利南.液基薄层细胞学技术在宫颈病变筛查中的应用及评价[J].国外医学(妇产科学分册),2004,31(4):252-255. 被引量:112
  • 2张建新,张长淮,周艳秋,吴瑞芳.15393例宫颈液基细胞学与组织病理学的对照分析[J].中华病理学杂志,2007,36(7):485-488. 被引量:36
  • 3Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol, 1999,189( 1 ) : 12-19.
  • 4Maxwell GL, Carlson JW, Ochoa M, et al. Costs and effectiveness of alternative strategies for cervical cancer screening in military beneficiaries. Obstet Gynocol, 2002, 100 (4) :740-748.
  • 5Belinson JL, Qiao YL, Pretorius R, et al. Shanxi province cervical cancer screening study: a cross-sectional comparative trial of multiple techniques to detect cervical neoplasia. J Gynecol Oncol, 2001,83 (2) : 439-444.
  • 6Davey E, Barratt A, Irwig L, et al. Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review. Lancet,2006,367(9505) : 122-132.
  • 7Hutchinson ML, Isenstein LM, Goodman A, et al. Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep processor. Am J Clin Pathl, 1994, 101 (2) : 215-219.
  • 8Obwegeser JH, Brack S. Does liquid-based technology really improve detection of cervical neoplasia? Acta Cytol, 2001,45 (5) :709-714.
  • 9Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, et al. American cancer society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. Ca Cancer J Clin, 2002,52(6) : 342-362.
  • 10Solomon D,Davey D,Kurman R,et al.The 2001 bethesda system:terminology for reporting results of cervicacytology.JAMA,2002,287:2114.

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部