期刊文献+

腰麻联合硬膜外麻醉在再次剖宫产术中的应用观察 被引量:4

Clinical observation on CSEA's application to the second cesarean section surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腰麻联合硬膜外麻醉在再次剖宫产术中的安全性及临床效果。方法:对160例需要再次剖宫产的产妇,随机分为腰麻联合硬膜外(CSEA)组和连续硬膜外(CEA)组,每组各80例,观察两组病例的起效时间、麻醉效果、麻醉至胎儿娩出时间、术中产妇生命体征情况、新生儿情况、麻醉并发症及不良反应。结果:CSEA组在麻醉起效时间、麻醉效果、麻醉至胎儿娩出时间均高于CEA组,P<0.05。术中产妇生命体征情况、新生儿情况、麻醉并发症及不良反应无显著差异。结论:CSEA组综合腰麻和硬膜外麻醉的优点,具有起效快,阻滞完善,对产妇呼吸、循环干扰少,母婴安全。腰麻联合硬膜外麻醉用于再次剖宫产是安全可行的。 Objective:To investigate the clinical effects and safety of the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA) in the second cesarean section.Methods:160 cases of delivery women with second cesarean section were introduced to use CSEA and continuous epidural anesthesia(CEA).The two products will be contrasted in the onset time,anesthetic efficacy,Anesthesia to fetal delivery time,Maternal and newborn life signs,adverse reaction,and so on.Results: There is a statistically significant difference(P value 0.05) of the onset time,anesthetic efficacy and the Anesthesia to fetal delivery time.The two groups had no significant adverse reactions about Maternal and newborn life signs,adverse reaction.Conclusions: CSEA combination of spinal anesthesia,as well as the advantages of epidural anesthesia.The advantages are as below: quick-effective,lower-dosage,and perfect-block,lower intervention to cycle and breath,no time limitation,linking the post operative PCA,and so on.CSEA anesthesia is safe,stable and feasible in the second cesarean section.
出处 《中国民康医学》 2012年第9期1059-1061,共3页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 腰麻联合硬膜外麻醉 硬膜外麻醉 再次剖宫产 Combined spinal epidural anesthesia Epidural anesthesia Second cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献25

  • 1张玉梅,周奋梅,朱玲玲.再次剖宫产149例临床分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2007,8(2):142-143. 被引量:8
  • 2岳云,吴新民,罗爱伦,主译.摩根临床麻醉学.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:751.
  • 3Lynch CM,Kearney R,Turner MJ.Maternal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section after two or more previous procedures.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.2003,106:10-13.
  • 4Palmer C,Tucson MD,Arizona.Obstetric emergencies and anesthetic management.American Society of Anesthesiologists,Annual meeting reflesher course lecture,2008,140.
  • 5Uygur D,Gun O,Kelekci S,et al.Multiple repeat caesarean section-,is it safe? Eur J Obstet Gyneeol Reprod Biol,2005,119:171-175.
  • 6Zwart JJ,Richters JM,Ory F,et al.Uterine rupture in The Netherlands:a nationwide population-based cohort study.BJOG.2009,116:1069-1078.
  • 7American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia.Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia:an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologi-ests Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia.Anestheiology,2007,106:843-863.
  • 8Dahlgren G,Granath F,Wossel H,et al.Predication of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section and its relation to the effect of crystalloid or colloid preload.Int J Obstet Anesth,2007,16:128-134.
  • 9陈利民 沈七襄 陈燕辉.联合腰麻—硬膜外麻醉单点法与双点法的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1998,18:504-504.
  • 10Hafer J, Rupp D, Wollbruck M, et al. The effect of needle type and immobilization on postspinal headache. Anaesthesist, 1997,6:860-866.

共引文献362

同被引文献19

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部