期刊文献+

发酵床不同垫料配比对肉鸡生长性能及鸡舍环境的影响 被引量:12

Effects of Different Litter Ratio on Growth Performance of Broilers and on Environment in Chicken Coops in Deep-litter System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过养殖试验,比较了发酵床不同垫料配比对肉鸡生长性能及鸡舍环境的影响。按照总重量相同原则,试验共设5个处理,分别为:常规垫料(CK)、70%常规垫料+30%玉米秸秆(30%S)、40%常规垫料+60%玉米秸秆(60%S)、10%常规垫料+90%玉米秸秆(90%S)、20%常规垫料+60%玉米秸秆+20%沸石(60%S+20%Z)。结果表明:(1)试验期间各试验组平均日增重、平均日耗料、料肉比均差异不显著(P>0.05);但处理30%S料肉比最低、死淘数最少;(2)各处理垫料含水率和氨浓度随肉鸡的生长逐渐升高,其中30%S处理含水率比CK降低了12.91%,平均氨浓度比CK降低了7.96%。综合判断,本试验条件下常规垫料和玉米秸秆按30%S混合作垫料饲养肉鸡最为适宜。 A pile experiment was carried out on broilers feed farm,to research on the effects of different litter ratio on growth performance of broilers and on environment in chicken coops in Deep-litter System.For the same total mass of each treatment,5 treatments were carried out: traditional litter(CK),70% traditional litter + 30% corn straw(30% S),40% traditional litter + 60% corn straw(60% S),10% traditional litter + 90% corn straw(90% S),20% traditional litter+60% corn straw+20% zeolite(60% S+20% Z).The results showed that:(1) there were no significant differences in average daily gain(ADG),average daily feed intake(ADFI),feed to gain ratio(F/G) among all treatments(P0.05);but 30% S had lower feed to gain ratio(F/G) and death number than other treatments;(2) the moisture content and the concentration of NH3 rose gradually during the broilers growth.The moisture content of 30% S lower 12.91% than CK,the average concentration of NH3 lower 7.96% than CK.
出处 《中国农学通报》 CSCD 2012年第14期6-11,共6页 Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
基金 北京市农林科学院一般项目"生态健康养鸡综合配套技术研究示范" 北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设专项"循环农业科技示范基地完善与提升"(KJCX201105006) 科技部科技人员服务企业行动项目"有机蔬菜土壤培肥与养分调控技术集成与示范"(2009GJA00013)
关键词 发酵床 垫料 肉鸡 生长性能 鸡舍环境 deep-litter system litter broilers growth performance environment in chicken coops
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Gadd J. Unnel housing of pigs in Livestock Environment IV. Fourth International Symposium[M]. Michigan, American society of Agricultural Enginneers, 1993:1040-1048.
  • 2沈晓昆,戴网成.镇江发酵床养殖10年历程[J].农业装备技术,2009,35(6):12-14. 被引量:15
  • 3Kapuinen P. Deep litter system for beef cattle housed in unin-sulated barns, part 2: temperatures and nutrients[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research,2001,80(1): 87-97.
  • 4Deininger A, Tamm M, Krause R, et al. Penetration resistance and water-holding capacity of differently conditioned straw for deep litter housing systems[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 2000,77(3):335-342.
  • 5黄彪,王广民,戴网成,颜培实.大棚式发酵床蛋鸡舍卫生学评价[J].畜牧与兽医,2010,42(9):46-49. 被引量:9
  • 6刘振钦,高继辉.有机生态菌发酵床养鸡[J].菌物研究,2009,7(3):193-194. 被引量:17
  • 7Oliveira P A, Souloumiac D, Robin P, et al. Heat production by fattening pigs in deep-litter or conventional slatted floor systems[J]. Annales de Zootechnie, 1999,48:117-129.
  • 8黄保华,武彬,石天虹,井庆川,艾武,魏祥法,刘涛,刘雪兰,阎佩佩.发酵床养殖垫料粪污承载力的影响因素研究[J].家禽科学,2010(8):6-9. 被引量:16
  • 9NY/T388-1999,畜禽场环境质量标准[S].
  • 10Vranken E, Claes S, Hendriks J, et al. Intermittent measurements to determine ammonia emissions from livestock buildings[J]. Biosystems Engineering,2004,88(3):351-358.

二级参考文献42

共引文献107

同被引文献160

引证文献12

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部