期刊文献+

消费者认知需要对销售人员销售策略的影响研究 被引量:2

A Study of the Effect of Need for Cognition on Direct Seller's Selling Strategy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究通过两个实验验证了认知需要水平对销售人员新产品销售策略的影响。实验1的研究结论表明认知需要高的消费者对采取全新归类策略的新产品的接受意愿更高,而认知需要低的消费者对采取增进归类策略的新产品的接受意愿更高。实验2的研究进一步表明,认知需要之所以产生上述作用的原因在于消费者在接触新产品信息过程中,认知努力的差异,并证实认知努力在销售人员新产品销售策略、认知需要和新产品接受意愿的作用关系中起到了中介的作用。本文的研究对企业、销售人员以及消费者都具有指导意义。 The current research investigates the effect of consumers' need for cognition on direct sellers' selling strategy through multiple-experiment design. Experiment 1 show that consumers with high need for cognition are more likely to accept new product which is introduced using really new categorized strategy, consumers with low need for cognition are more likely to accept new product which is introduced using incremental new categorized strategy. Furthermore, the results of experiment 2 find that this is the case because the role of cognitive efforts, which act as a mediator in the relationship between new product selling strategy, need for cognition, and willingness to accept. This research has some implications for corporate, direct sellers, and consumers' behavior.
出处 《南京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期22-29,共8页 Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“企业社会责任与品牌评价--基于个体认知差异和评价情景的实验研究”(71072044) 教育部人文社科青年项目“服务品牌的本土化测评与影响因素”(10yjc630073)成果之一
关键词 全新归类 增进归类 认知需要 认知努力 接受意愿 really new categorize incremental categorize need for cognition cognitive ef-forts willingness to accept
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Feiereisen, S. , Wong, V. , & Broderick, A.J. 2008. Analo- gies and Mental Simulations in Learning for Really New Prod- ucts : The Role Visual Attention. The Journal of Product Innova- tion Management, Vol. 25 : 593 - 607.
  • 2Song, X. M. , & Montoya, M.M. 1998. Critical Development Activities for Really New versus Incremental Products. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15 : 125 - 135.
  • 3)Chakravarti, D., Maclnnis, D.J., & Nakamoto, K. 1990. Product Category Perceptions, Elaborative Processing and BrandName Extension Strategies, in Advances in Consumer Research Volume 17, eds. Marvin E. Goldberg, Gerald Gorn, and Rich- ard W. Pollay, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 910-916.
  • 4Thompson, S. A. , & Sinha, R. K. 2008. Brand Communities and New Product Adoption: The Influence and Limits of Opposi- tional Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 72 ( Nov. ) :65 - 80.
  • 5董伊人,何健,高华超.直销绩效影响因素的实证研究[J].经济纵横,2010(8):117-121. 被引量:6
  • 6Schwartz, B. L. , & Metcalfe, J. 1992. Cue Familiarity but not Target Retrievability Enhances Feeling - of - Knowing Judg- ments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 18 (5) : 1074 - 1083.
  • 7Wood, S. L. , Lynch Jr. , J. G. 2002. Prior Knowledge and Complacency in New Product Learning, Journal of Consumer Re- search, 29 (December) : 416 - 26.
  • 8Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. 1983. Effects of Need for Cognition on Message Evaluation, Recall, and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 45, 805 - 818.
  • 9Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. 1982. The Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1) : 116 - 131.
  • 10Chaiken, S. 1987. The Heuristic Model of Persuasion, Social influence : The Ontario symposium, 5, 3 - 39.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Allport, G. W. Pattern and Growth in Personality, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1961.
  • 2Barrick,M. R. &Mount, M. IC The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta - analysis. Personnel Psychology, 1991, 44:Pp. 1 -26.
  • 3Block, J. A contrarian view of the five - factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 1995, 117 : pp. 187 -215.
  • 4Cattel, R B. The Description of Personality: Basic Trait Resolved into Clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1943.
  • 5Churehill,G. A. ,Ford,N. M. ,Hartley,S. W. ,and Walker O. C. ( 1985 ). The determinants of salesperson performance : A meta -analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, pp. 103 -118.
  • 6Costa, P. T. Jr. , and Mc Crae, R. R. Revised NEO personality inventory ( NEO - PI - R ) and NEO five - factor inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manua, Odessa, FL: PAR, 1992.
  • 7Eysenck,H. J. A reply to Costa and Mc Crae. P or A and C-the role of theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 1992b, 13 :Pp. 867 - 868.
  • 8Eysenck, H. J. Dimensions of personality : 16, 5 or 3 - Criteria for a taxonomic paradigrm Personality and Individual Differenees, 1991, 12: pp. 773-790.
  • 9Eysenck,H.L J. Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 1992a, 13 :pp. 667 -673.
  • 10郭永玉.人格心理学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.

共引文献5

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部