期刊文献+

高频振荡通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效分析

Analysis of therapeutic effect of high frequency oscillatory ventilation on premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨高频振荡通气(HFOV)治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)的疗效。方法:选取早产儿NRDS患儿98例,随机分为高频振荡通气治疗组和常频机械通气治疗组,比较两组之间的上机时间、上机后血气分析、氧合指数(OI)以及出现气胸等并发症发生率。结果:HFOV组上机后2 h、8 h、24 h的血气分析值和氧合指数明显优于CMV组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),气胸、慢性肺疾病等并发症的发生率HFOV组明显低于CMV组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:HFOV治疗早产儿NRDS较CMV能更好地改善氧合,更快地下调氧浓度,减少上机时间和肺部并发症。 Objective To study the therapeutic effect of high frequency oscillatory ventilation on premature infants with respiratory dis- tress syndrome (RDS). Method We assigned 98 infants with NRDS entry the study. They were randomly devided into high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) group and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) group. The blood gas analysis, time of breathing machine, oxygenation index and aeropleura were detected and compared between the two groups. Results The HFOV group with the levels of the blood gas analysis, oxygenation index were higher than the CMV group ( P 〈 O. 05 ). The attack rate of aeropleura, chronicity pulmonary disease in the HFOV group was lower than the CMV group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion In the treatment of premature neonates with RDS, HFOV has a better pulmonary oxygenation and lower air leak than the CMV.
出处 《吉林医学》 CAS 2012年第13期2733-2734,共2页 Jilin Medical Journal
关键词 高频振荡通气 常频机械通气 早产儿 新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征 High frequency oscillatory ventilation Conventional mechanical ventilation Premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献43

  • 1戎群芳,黄绮薇,汤定华,张宇鸣.高频通气治疗新生儿重症呼吸衰竭[J].小儿急救医学,2004,11(4):228-230. 被引量:19
  • 2刘棋明,曹南华,胡春芳,曹爱华.固尔苏预防早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床观察[J].儿科药学杂志,2005,11(3):42-44. 被引量:11
  • 3郭宇红,郑平,张雪芳.简易CPAP鼻塞治疗新生儿肺透明膜病疗效体会[J].实用中西医结合临床,2005,5(4):31-31. 被引量:17
  • 4韩云坤,单立业.新型鼻塞持续气道正压呼吸治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征临床观察[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(12):88-89. 被引量:4
  • 5[1]Keszler M, Durand DJ. Neonatal high-frequency ventilation: past, present, and future [J]. Clin Perinatol, 2001, 28(2): 579-588.
  • 6[2]The HIFI Study Group. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants [J]. N Engl J Med, 1989, 320(4): 88-93.
  • 7[3]Abbasi S, Bhutani VK, Spitzer AR, et al. Pulmonary mechanics in preterm neonates with respiratory failure treated with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation [J]. Pediatrics, 1991, 87(3): 487-493.
  • 8[4]Clark RH, Gerstmann DR, Null DM, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of high-frequency oscillatory and conventional ventilation in respiratory distress syndrome [J]. Pediatrics, 1992, 89(1): 5-12.
  • 9[5]HIFO Study Group. Randomized study of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in infants with severe respiratory distress [J]. J Pediatr, 1993, 122(1): 609-619.
  • 10[6]Ogawa Y, Miyasaka K, Kawano T, et al. A multicenter randomized trial of high frequency oscillatory ventilation as compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory failure [J]. Early Hum Dev, 1993, 32(6): 1-10.

共引文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部